H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Tommy Robredo vs Simone Bolelli H2H: 3-2

Tommy Robredo holds a 3–2 lead over Simone Bolelli in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Tommy Robredo leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Simone Bolelli leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Tommy Robredo won the 2015 Shenzhen quarterfinal 1-6 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Robredo
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Simone Bolelli
ITA Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 27, 2018* Roland Garros Grand Slam Q1 Q Clay Simone Bolelli #130 6-4 6-4 Tommy Robredo #168 Match data
Oct 3, 2015* Shenzhen ATP 250 QF Hard Tommy Robredo #30 1-6 6-2 6-4 Simone Bolelli #62 Match data
Aug 29, 2014* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Tommy Robredo #18 5-7 6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 6-2 Simone Bolelli #85 Match data
Feb 14, 2013* Sao Paulo ATP 250 R32 Clay Simone Bolelli #80 6-2 6-4 Tommy Robredo #94 Match data
Apr 21, 2010* Barcelona ATP 500 R64 Clay Simone Bolelli #143 6-7(7) 6-4 3-1 (ret.) Tommy Robredo #20 Match data
Feb 22, 2007* Rotterdam ATP 500 R32 Hard Tommy Robredo #7 6-2 6-2 Simone Bolelli #114 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Robredo #1,059 #5 2,770 2,048 523 351 59.8% 0 1 0 0 11 12
Simone Bolelli #1,391 #36 1,686 1,920 114 156 42.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Robredo Simone Bolelli
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 2–2 50.0% #244 1,534 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #131 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 37–20 64.9% #30 1,761 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2002 32–25 56.1% #30 1,794 0 1 2006 0–4 0.0% #127 1,465 0 0
21 2003 38–26 59.4% #21 1,761 0 1 2007 8–14 36.4% #67 1,602 0 0
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #13 1,823 0 2 2008 26–27 49.1% #41 1,785 0 0
23 2005 42–24 63.6% #19 1,849 0 2 2009 14–22 38.9% #93 1,694 0 0
24 2006 49–26 65.3% #7 1,868 0 4 2010 5–11 31.2% #107 1,675 0 0
25 2007 48–25 65.8% #10 1,856 0 6 2011 4–8 33.3% #134 1,679 0 0
26 2008 35–22 61.4% #21 1,882 0 7 2012 6–10 37.5% #84 1,713 0 0
27 2009 46–24 65.7% #16 1,903 0 9 2013 6–8 42.9% #245 1,693 0 0
28 2010 20–23 46.5% #50 1,796 0 9 2014 6–8 42.9% #55 1,743 0 0
29 2011 20–14 58.8% #51 1,760 0 10 2015 28–25 52.8% #58 1,865 0 0
30 2012 5–7 41.7% #114 1,752 0 10 2016 2–8 20.0% #464 1,770 0 0
31 2013 36–20 64.3% #18 2,000 0 12 2017 2–4 33.3% #171 1,792 0 0
32 2014 43–26 62.3% #17 1,998 0 12 2018 5–4 55.6% #141 1,783 0 0
33 2015 23–20 53.5% #42 1,883 0 12 2019 1–3 25.0% #334 1,734 0 0
34 2016 2–6 25.0% #358 1,814 0 12 — — — — — — —
35 2017 6–11 35.3% #164 1,740 0 12 — — — — — — —
36 2018 0–2 0.0% #201 1,684 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 2019 0–1 0.0% #205 1,582 0 12 — — — — — — —
39 — — — — — — — 2025 1–0 100.0% — 1,741 0 0
40 2022 0–1 0.0% #1043 1,502 0 12 — — — — — — —