H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tommy Robredo vs Sjeng Schalken H2H: 2-2

Tommy Robredo and Sjeng Schalken are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Sjeng Schalken leads 2–1 on grass, while Tommy Robredo leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 2003 S Hertogenbosch quarterfinal 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Robredo
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Sjeng Schalken
NED Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 21, 2003* S Hertogenbosch ATP 250 QF Grass Sjeng Schalken #12 7-5 6-4 Tommy Robredo #21 Match data
Mar 13, 2003* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Tommy Robredo #27 5-7 6-2 6-0 Sjeng Schalken #14 Match data
Jun 22, 2002* S Hertogenbosch ATP 250 SF Grass Sjeng Schalken #31 6-3 6-3 Tommy Robredo #30 Match data
Jun 23, 2001* S Hertogenbosch ATP 250 QF Grass Tommy Robredo #69 6-3 6-4 Sjeng Schalken #28 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Robredo #1,059 #5 2,770 2,048 523 351 59.8% 0 1 0 0 11 12
Sjeng Schalken #677 #11 1,790 1,934 280 254 52.4% 0 0 0 0 9 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Robredo Sjeng Schalken
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 2–2 50.0% #244 1,534 0 0 1994 1–2 33.3% #148 1,501 0 0
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #131 1,496 0 0 1995 17–14 54.8% #69 1,645 0 1
19 2001 37–20 64.9% #30 1,761 0 1 1996 26–26 50.0% #65 1,687 0 2
20 2002 32–25 56.1% #30 1,794 0 1 1997 16–25 39.0% #59 1,632 0 3
21 2003 38–26 59.4% #21 1,761 0 1 1998 22–30 42.3% #66 1,592 0 3
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #13 1,823 0 2 1999 28–26 51.9% #44 1,744 0 4
23 2005 42–24 63.6% #19 1,849 0 2 2000 35–26 57.4% #22 1,824 0 5
24 2006 49–26 65.3% #7 1,868 0 4 2001 36–27 57.1% #26 1,846 0 6
25 2007 48–25 65.8% #10 1,856 0 6 2002 36–27 57.1% #20 1,839 0 7
26 2008 35–22 61.4% #21 1,882 0 7 2003 39–23 62.9% #18 1,826 0 9
27 2009 46–24 65.7% #16 1,903 0 9 2004 17–18 48.6% #57 1,698 0 9
28 2010 20–23 46.5% #50 1,796 0 9 2005 7–10 41.2% #230 1,664 0 9
29 2011 20–14 58.8% #51 1,760 0 10 — — — — — — —
30 2012 5–7 41.7% #114 1,752 0 10 — — — — — — —
31 2013 36–20 64.3% #18 2,000 0 12 — — — — — — —
32 2014 43–26 62.3% #17 1,998 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 2015 23–20 53.5% #42 1,883 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 2016 2–6 25.0% #358 1,814 0 12 — — — — — — —
35 2017 6–11 35.3% #164 1,740 0 12 — — — — — — —
36 2018 0–2 0.0% #201 1,684 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 2019 0–1 0.0% #205 1,582 0 12 — — — — — — —
40 2022 0–1 0.0% #1043 1,502 0 12 — — — — — — —