H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Tommy Robredo vs Tim Henman H2H: 0-4

Tim Henman holds a 4–0 lead over Tommy Robredo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2005 Indian Wells Masters fourth round 6-4 2-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Robredo
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main draw meetings
Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 12, 2005* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Tim Henman #6 6-4 2-6 6-2 Tommy Robredo #12 Match data
Feb 19, 2004* Rotterdam ATP 250 R32 Hard Tim Henman #11 7-5 6-2 Tommy Robredo #20 Match data
Mar 13, 2002* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tim Henman #11 6-2 6-7(7) 6-4 Tommy Robredo #34 Match data
Oct 26, 2000* Basel ATP 250 R32 Carpet Tim Henman #10 6-3 6-4 Tommy Robredo #140 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Robredo #1,059 #5 2,770 2,048 523 351 59.8% 0 1 0 0 11 12
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Robredo Tim Henman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 2–2 50.0% #244 1,534 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #131 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 37–20 64.9% #30 1,761 0 1 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0
20 2002 32–25 56.1% #30 1,794 0 1 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0
21 2003 38–26 59.4% #21 1,761 0 1 1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #13 1,823 0 2 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2
23 2005 42–24 63.6% #19 1,849 0 2 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4
24 2006 49–26 65.3% #7 1,868 0 4 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4
25 2007 48–25 65.8% #10 1,856 0 6 2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6
26 2008 35–22 61.4% #21 1,882 0 7 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8
27 2009 46–24 65.7% #16 1,903 0 9 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9
28 2010 20–23 46.5% #50 1,796 0 9 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11
29 2011 20–14 58.8% #51 1,760 0 10 2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11
30 2012 5–7 41.7% #114 1,752 0 10 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11
31 2013 36–20 64.3% #18 2,000 0 12 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11
32 2014 43–26 62.3% #17 1,998 0 12 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11
33 2015 23–20 53.5% #42 1,883 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 2016 2–6 25.0% #358 1,814 0 12 — — — — — — —
35 2017 6–11 35.3% #164 1,740 0 12 — — — — — — —
36 2018 0–2 0.0% #201 1,684 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 2019 0–1 0.0% #205 1,582 0 12 — — — — — — —
40 2022 0–1 0.0% #1043 1,502 0 12 — — — — — — —