H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tommy Robredo vs Todd Martin H2H: 3-1

Tommy Robredo holds a 3–1 lead over Todd Martin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tommy Robredo leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Todd Martin leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tommy Robredo won the 2002 Stockholm fourth round 6-4 3-6 7-6(2).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Robredo
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Todd Martin
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 25, 2002* Stockholm ATP 250 R16 Hard Tommy Robredo #35 6-4 3-6 7-6(2) Todd Martin #52 Match data
Aug 7, 2002* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tommy Robredo #33 4-6 6-4 7-6(1) Todd Martin #45 Match data
Aug 31, 2001* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Tommy Robredo #39 6-3 7-5 3-6 6-3 Todd Martin #34 Match data
Apr 16, 1999* Barcelona ATP 250 R16 Clay Todd Martin #8 6-3 7-6(6) Tommy Robredo #410 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Robredo #1,059 #5 2,770 2,048 523 351 59.8% 0 1 0 0 11 12
Todd Martin #145 #4 2,969 2,063 398 222 64.2% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Robredo Todd Martin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 2–2 50.0% #244 1,534 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #131 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 37–20 64.9% #30 1,761 0 1 1990 3–4 42.9% #269 1,508 0 0
20 2002 32–25 56.1% #30 1,794 0 1 1991 10–8 55.6% #134 1,648 0 0
21 2003 38–26 59.4% #21 1,761 0 1 1992 22–19 53.7% #87 1,724 0 0
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #13 1,823 0 2 1993 45–23 66.2% #13 1,886 0 1
23 2005 42–24 63.6% #19 1,849 0 2 1994 50–19 72.5% #10 1,943 0 3
24 2006 49–26 65.3% #7 1,868 0 4 1995 45–21 68.2% #18 1,912 0 4
25 2007 48–25 65.8% #10 1,856 0 6 1996 49–20 71.0% #12 1,926 0 5
26 2008 35–22 61.4% #21 1,882 0 7 1997 13–7 65.0% #81 1,914 0 5
27 2009 46–24 65.7% #16 1,903 0 9 1998 43–20 68.3% #16 1,998 0 7
28 2010 20–23 46.5% #50 1,796 0 9 1999 42–17 71.2% #7 1,914 0 8
29 2011 20–14 58.8% #51 1,760 0 10 2000 14–11 56.0% #55 1,887 0 8
30 2012 5–7 41.7% #114 1,752 0 10 2001 13–11 54.2% #57 1,823 0 8
31 2013 36–20 64.3% #18 2,000 0 12 2002 24–16 60.0% #47 1,788 0 8
32 2014 43–26 62.3% #17 1,998 0 12 2003 15–11 57.7% #68 1,828 0 8
33 2015 23–20 53.5% #42 1,883 0 12 2004 10–15 40.0% #145 1,684 0 8
34 2016 2–6 25.0% #358 1,814 0 12 — — — — — — —
35 2017 6–11 35.3% #164 1,740 0 12 — — — — — — —
36 2018 0–2 0.0% #201 1,684 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 2019 0–1 0.0% #205 1,582 0 12 — — — — — — —
40 2022 0–1 0.0% #1043 1,502 0 12 — — — — — — —