H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Tommy Robredo vs Tommy Haas H2H: 1-4

Tommy Haas holds a 4–1 lead over Tommy Robredo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Tommy Haas leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2013 Madrid Open second round 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Robredo
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tommy Haas #13 6-3 7-5 Tommy Robredo #36 Match data May 8, 2013* R32 Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay
Tommy Haas #21 6-3 6-3 Tommy Robredo #116 Match data Oct 10, 2012* R32 Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Tommy Haas #38 6-4 6-4 6-3 Tommy Robredo #19 Match data Jun 26, 2008* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Tommy Robredo #35 6-4 6-4 Tommy Haas #2 Match data May 18, 2002* R16 Hamburg Open Masters 1000 Clay
Tommy Haas #16 7-6(3) 3-6 6-2 Tommy Robredo #39 Match data Aug 24, 2001* R16 Long Island ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tommy Robredo #1,059 #5 2,770 2,051 525 353 59.8% 0 1 0 1 10 12
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,116 540 333 61.9% 0 1 0 4 10 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Robredo Tommy Haas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 2–2 50.0% #244 1,534 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #131 1,496 0 0 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,588 0 0
19 2001 37–20 64.9% #30 1,761 0 1 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,722 0 0
20 2002 32–25 56.1% #30 1,793 0 1 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,820 0 0
21 2003 38–26 59.4% #21 1,760 0 1 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,833 0 1
22 2004 41–25 62.1% #13 1,831 0 2 2000 32–21 60.4% #23 1,813 0 1
23 2005 42–24 63.6% #19 1,851 0 2 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,011 0 5
24 2006 49–26 65.3% #7 1,867 0 4 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,863 0 5
25 2007 48–25 65.8% #10 1,856 0 6 — — — — — — —
26 2008 35–23 60.3% #21 1,872 0 7 2004 36–19 65.5% #17 1,916 0 7
27 2009 46–24 65.7% #16 1,905 0 9 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,767 0 7
28 2010 20–23 46.5% #50 1,796 0 9 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,892 0 10
29 2011 20–14 58.8% #51 1,785 0 10 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,894 0 11
30 2012 5–7 41.7% #114 1,768 0 10 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,857 0 11
31 2013 36–20 64.3% #18 2,004 0 12 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,940 0 12
32 2014 43–26 62.3% #17 1,999 0 12 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,865 0 12
33 2015 23–20 53.5% #42 1,884 0 12 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,771 0 12
34 2016 2–6 25.0% #358 1,813 0 12 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,975 0 13
35 2017 6–11 35.3% #164 1,740 0 12 2013 47–24 66.2% #12 2,024 0 15
36 2018 0–2 0.0% #201 1,684 0 12 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,911 0 15
37 2019 0–1 0.0% #205 1,583 0 12 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,788 0 15
39 — — — — — — — 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,689 0 15
40 2022 0–1 0.0% #1043 1,502 0 12 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tommy Robredo Tommy Haas
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1999 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 10 7 17 58.8% 23 9 32 71.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1997 10 8 18 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
20 2002 14 14 28 50.0% 14 7 21 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1998 18 15 33 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
21 2003 10 14 24 41.7% 22 8 30 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1999 25 12 37 67.6% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 2004 20 12 32 62.5% 14 7 21 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 2000 18 9 27 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 2005 20 11 31 64.5% 18 9 27 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2001 41 12 53 77.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0%
24 2006 22 16 38 57.9% 22 6 28 78.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2002 25 14 39 64.1% 17 7 24 70.8% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2007 27 13 40 67.5% 18 9 27 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2008 12 14 26 46.2% 21 7 28 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2004 24 11 35 68.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2009 17 13 30 56.7% 27 9 36 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2005 15 12 27 55.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 2010 15 15 30 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2006 34 10 44 77.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7%
29 2011 8 7 15 53.3% 12 6 18 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 31 13 44 70.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
30 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 15 11 26 57.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
31 2013 9 9 18 50.0% 25 10 35 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2009 15 14 29 51.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% — — — —
32 2014 25 13 38 65.8% 15 12 27 55.6% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2010 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 11 10 21 52.4% 11 8 19 57.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2011 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
34 2016 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 16 12 28 57.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — —
35 2017 1 2 3 33.3% 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — — 2013 28 15 43 65.1% 14 7 21 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
36 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 7 6 13 53.8% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — —
37 2019 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 0 3 3 0.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
40 2022 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 226 182 408 55.4% 256 130 386 66.3% 30 24 54 55.6% 13 17 30 43.3% — 335 197 532 63.0% 117 82 199 58.8% 57 34 91 62.6% 31 20 51 60.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 853/878 of Tommy Robredo's and 805/873 of Tommy Haas's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tommy Robredo Tommy Haas
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1999 2/4 0.0 0.5 62.8% 65.2% 54.5% 55.0% 72.7% 61.7% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 2/2 0.0 3.5 63.6% 62.8% 26.7% 65.7% 16.7% 49.7% 28.1% 1996 7/7 3.7 3.9 53.5% 70.9% 59.6% 71.3% 67.6% 65.3% 36.7%
19 2001 52/57 3.5 2.9 64.8% 70.5% 51.2% 58.7% 47.5% 63.6% 40.7% 1997 36/39 5.5 3.8 59.8% 71.0% 49.5% 55.1% 44.9% 62.5% 38.5%
20 2002 48/57 1.9 2.8 68.1% 63.7% 50.6% 54.5% 40.3% 59.2% 40.1% 1998 51/60 4.9 4.1 58.9% 71.1% 48.0% 55.1% 44.2% 61.3% 39.1%
21 2003 63/64 2.7 2.9 68.6% 66.9% 51.0% 52.8% 43.5% 61.9% 40.1% 1999 54/68 8.4 5.6 53.0% 76.3% 50.6% 62.2% 43.2% 64.2% 35.9%
22 2004 62/66 4.3 3.1 59.8% 71.5% 50.1% 59.9% 39.7% 63.1% 37.9% 2000 39/53 7.0 4.4 54.3% 74.2% 51.0% 59.5% 43.0% 63.5% 35.9%
23 2005 65/66 3.8 2.9 61.4% 71.2% 50.2% 58.0% 40.5% 63.0% 41.5% 2001 62/74 7.7 3.9 56.4% 76.7% 52.4% 64.4% 42.5% 66.0% 39.7%
24 2006 75/75 3.2 1.8 69.2% 68.7% 53.3% 62.1% 48.3% 63.8% 40.5% 2002 58/65 8.8 4.8 56.0% 75.4% 52.7% 61.9% 39.6% 65.5% 37.1%
25 2007 73/73 3.7 1.7 67.2% 68.6% 55.3% 58.6% 47.8% 64.1% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2008 57/58 3.1 1.5 68.4% 69.0% 52.3% 59.2% 40.6% 63.7% 38.8% 2004 53/55 5.9 3.4 57.9% 75.9% 52.0% 57.3% 46.4% 65.7% 39.2%
27 2009 70/70 4.2 2.1 63.4% 71.5% 55.2% 61.6% 43.4% 65.5% 38.9% 2005 49/49 6.7 3.6 57.8% 74.3% 52.7% 52.9% 43.6% 65.2% 37.8%
28 2010 43/43 4.3 2.1 64.8% 69.7% 54.5% 49.4% 40.9% 63.9% 36.1% 2006 67/67 7.1 3.2 61.0% 76.4% 54.5% 60.1% 40.2% 67.9% 38.3%
29 2011 32/34 3.8 2.4 62.5% 70.7% 55.4% 61.5% 40.1% 64.9% 38.8% 2007 52/53 8.0 3.0 60.6% 78.1% 55.6% 61.9% 43.3% 69.0% 38.7%
30 2012 12/12 4.8 2.2 60.7% 70.5% 49.6% 62.9% 64.6% 62.1% 35.8% 2008 32/33 7.3 3.8 59.4% 72.6% 52.0% 62.8% 40.9% 64.3% 38.1%
31 2013 56/56 4.5 2.2 60.6% 71.6% 52.3% 59.5% 42.7% 64.0% 39.0% 2009 48/49 9.1 4.9 60.2% 77.6% 53.0% 65.4% 44.8% 67.7% 35.3%
32 2014 69/69 5.1 2.0 63.8% 74.1% 54.0% 58.1% 39.6% 66.8% 37.2% 2010 7/7 9.9 4.6 60.9% 72.3% 50.5% 65.2% 38.4% 63.4% 35.1%
33 2015 43/43 3.7 2.0 62.8% 69.8% 51.3% 57.9% 45.1% 63.1% 36.4% 2011 19/19 7.8 4.3 59.9% 70.7% 51.7% 60.5% 43.6% 62.9% 34.9%
34 2016 8/8 5.0 2.6 61.4% 65.4% 49.3% 59.3% 30.0% 58.6% 30.2% 2012 47/48 6.2 3.4 59.6% 75.7% 53.9% 65.6% 43.9% 66.9% 39.1%
35 2017 17/17 2.2 1.6 65.1% 63.1% 47.3% 60.3% 47.0% 57.5% 35.1% 2013 68/71 6.1 3.3 61.3% 74.8% 54.0% 63.0% 41.1% 66.6% 37.8%
36 2018 2/2 2.0 3.0 63.5% 76.4% 52.9% 37.5% 14.3% 67.7% 27.0% 2014 25/25 4.6 2.0 63.7% 72.2% 53.8% 56.5% 49.5% 65.3% 36.9%
37 2019 1/1 2.0 2.0 60.8% 61.3% 40.0% 20.0% 0.0% 52.9% 28.6% 2015 11/11 4.0 4.7 62.5% 70.1% 50.4% 52.3% 31.9% 62.8% 31.0%
39 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 20/20 4.8 4.1 61.9% 68.9% 54.0% 61.4% 29.9% 63.1% 31.7%
40 2022 1/1 0.0 1.0 64.4% 44.8% 37.5% 0.0% 0.0% 42.2% 31.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 853/878 3.7 2.3 64.7% 69.7% 52.4% 58.2% 43.2% 63.4% 38.9% — 805/873 6.9 3.9 58.7% 74.7% 52.5% 60.6% 42.7% 65.5% 37.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tommy Robredo Tommy Haas
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1999 1534 111.3 -1.11 +0.08 1.149 52.8% — +25 — 44.4% -0.44 1–0 1–1 — -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 1496 104.2 -0.33 -3.63 0.558 40.7% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.14 1996 1588 144.9 +0.04 +2.74 1.057 51.8% +30 — — 58.8% +0.77 0–1 2–0 — -0.78
19 2001 1762 138.8 +1.70 +1.94 1.118 52.1% -113 +59 -142 59.9% +0.69 13–8 (62%) 16–10 (62%) — +1.44 1997 1723 139.6 +1.11 +0.51 1.027 50.7% -2 -80 -102 54.9% +0.37 9–8 (53%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.37
20 2002 1794 141.9 -1.86 +2.88 0.984 49.6% -51 +86 -168 50.0% -0.11 15–7 (68%) 11–10 (52%) — +0.25 1998 1821 150.9 +0.55 +1.94 1.010 50.5% -13 -133 -149 51.4% +0.19 10–6 (63%) 10–9 (53%) — -2.69
21 2003 1760 144.7 -0.06 +2.81 1.054 50.9% -81 +199 -70 53.8% +0.23 13–8 (62%) 11–12 (48%) — -0.05 1999 1833 148.8 +1.86 -1.09 1.003 50.2% +21 -62 -115 60.7% +0.62 13–7 (65%) 20–19 (51%) — +0.33
22 2004 1831 146.9 +0.42 +1.52 1.025 50.4% -13 +109 -123 56.6% +0.25 17–6 (74%) 15–11 (58%) — 0.00 2000 1814 145.1 +1.31 -0.68 0.983 49.9% +30 -33 -96 53.0% +0.31 14–3 (82%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.61
23 2005 1852 145.0 +0.69 +3.15 1.121 51.7% +8 +79 -187 58.9% +0.51 12–8 (60%) 9–8 (53%) — +1.57 2001 2012 160.6 +4.03 +2.88 1.170 52.7% +26 -246 -364 67.6% +1.30 17–3 (85%) 13–18 (42%) — -1.10
24 2006 1868 151.1 +1.63 +3.35 1.119 52.0% -22 +147 -213 62.8% +0.78 12–12 (50%) 13–11 (54%) — +1.81 2002 1863 149.4 +3.04 +0.31 1.074 51.4% +35 +17 — 62.0% +0.66 19–7 (73%) 17–11 (61%) — +1.60
25 2007 1857 150.3 +1.34 +3.23 1.134 52.3% +18 +126 -200 61.5% +0.75 16–10 (62%) 11–12 (48%) — +3.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2008 1873 148.9 +1.00 +2.34 1.071 51.1% -73 +190 — 55.9% +0.27 8–6 (57%) 15–9 (63%) — -0.66 2004 1917 153.9 +3.05 +2.94 1.143 52.4% +36 -67 -248 60.3% +0.68 10–5 (67%) 9–10 (47%) — -2.50
27 2009 1905 153.5 +2.25 +1.71 1.126 52.0% -15 +119 -212 60.7% +0.69 14–3 (82%) 15–5 (75%) — +2.30 2005 1767 138.3 +1.76 +0.90 1.088 51.1% +34 +44 -63 58.6% +0.48 4–8 (33%) 14–5 (74%) — +0.64
28 2010 1797 144.2 +0.33 -0.22 1.000 49.7% +33 +108 — 47.0% -0.24 5–8 (38%) 7–8 (47%) — +1.62 2006 1892 153.4 +4.99 +1.83 1.194 52.7% +57 -145 -124 69.5% +1.12 13–8 (62%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.81
29 2011 1786 146.5 +1.92 +0.31 1.105 51.8% +44 +149 — 62.2% +0.76 6–2 (75%) 5–4 (56%) — +2.04 2007 1894 152.7 +4.56 +2.83 1.249 53.6% +31 -196 -35 65.2% +1.02 8–6 (57%) 11–6 (65%) — +2.11
30 2012 1768 135.0 +0.23 -0.69 0.947 49.1% +22 +146 — 51.6% -0.48 0–4 (0%) 1–0 — -0.13 2008 1858 140.5 +1.47 +1.79 1.068 51.1% +30 — +20 54.8% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.96
31 2013 2004 157.9 +1.54 +1.91 1.083 51.3% -155 +67 -307 58.8% +0.55 14–4 (78%) 14–9 (61%) — -0.69 2009 1941 151.0 +3.54 -0.13 1.093 51.7% -108 -141 +173 61.2% +0.76 10–6 (63%) 15–13 (54%) — -1.53
32 2014 1999 163.7 +2.95 +1.79 1.118 51.6% +11 -78 -165 59.1% +0.51 10–10 (50%) 24–20 (55%) — +0.70 2010 1866 115.9 -0.81 -0.45 0.960 49.6% -85 — — 45.5% -0.05 1–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.43
33 2015 1885 151.8 -1.22 +0.52 0.987 49.7% +56 +17 -99 52.3% -0.03 10–7 (59%) 6–7 (46%) — +1.91 2011 1772 128.1 -0.01 -0.99 0.941 48.9% +11 — +215 45.1% -0.23 2–4 (33%) 8–6 (57%) — +1.11
34 2016 1814 131.0 -1.43 -1.82 0.730 45.3% +32 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–1 3–3 (50%) — -0.56 2012 1975 163.7 +4.25 +2.56 1.182 52.7% -70 -48 +106 61.9% +0.71 7–7 (50%) 11–5 (69%) — -1.93
35 2017 1741 121.5 -3.64 -0.64 0.826 46.6% +76 -4 — 36.6% -0.83 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — -0.84 2013 2024 167.7 +3.58 +2.30 1.133 52.1% -25 +9 +118 65.3% +0.87 13–8 (62%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.12
36 2018 1685 121.0 -3.18 +3.15 0.838 46.8% — — — 16.7% -1.34 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.31 2014 1911 147.8 +1.08 +0.76 1.066 51.1% +26 +47 — 58.8% +0.77 7–2 (78%) 5–2 (71%) — +1.30
37 2019 1583 99.7 -0.51 -0.32 0.607 41.0% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.30 2015 1788 121.7 -0.85 -1.47 0.835 47.3% +57 — +212 32.3% -1.23 0–3 (0%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.82
38 2020 1582 103.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 1514 92.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1689 129.1 -1.47 -2.29 0.859 47.7% +75 +108 +206 36.0% -0.80 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.60
40 2022 1503 96.1 -0.65 -5.56 0.541 36.6% — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2051 153.4 +0.86 +1.96 1.064 51.0% -18 +95 -163 56.4% +0.35 169–107 (61%) 178–143 (55%) 107.1 +1.61 — 2117 158.2 +2.62 +1.22 1.087 51.5% +10 -44 +3 59.5% +0.62 170–105 (62%) 198–152 (57%) 109.2 -0.69

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.