H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tommy Robredo vs Tommy Haas H2H: 1-4

Tommy Haas holds a 4–1 lead over Tommy Robredo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Tommy Haas leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2013 Madrid Masters third round 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Robredo
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 8, 2013* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Tommy Haas #13 6-3 7-5 Tommy Robredo #36 Match data
Oct 10, 2012* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Tommy Haas #21 6-3 6-3 Tommy Robredo #116 Match data
Jun 26, 2008* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Tommy Haas #38 6-4 6-4 6-3 Tommy Robredo #19 Match data
May 18, 2002* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Tommy Robredo #35 6-4 6-4 Tommy Haas #2 Match data
Aug 24, 2001* Long Island ATP 250 R16 Hard Tommy Haas #16 7-6(3) 3-6 6-2 Tommy Robredo #39 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Robredo #1,059 #5 2,770 2,048 523 351 59.8% 0 1 0 0 11 12
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Robredo Tommy Haas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 2–2 50.0% #244 1,534 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #131 1,496 0 0 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0
19 2001 37–20 64.9% #30 1,761 0 1 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0
20 2002 32–25 56.1% #30 1,794 0 1 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0
21 2003 38–26 59.4% #21 1,761 0 1 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #13 1,823 0 2 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1
23 2005 42–24 63.6% #19 1,849 0 2 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5
24 2006 49–26 65.3% #7 1,868 0 4 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5
25 2007 48–25 65.8% #10 1,856 0 6 — — — — — — —
26 2008 35–22 61.4% #21 1,882 0 7 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7
27 2009 46–24 65.7% #16 1,903 0 9 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7
28 2010 20–23 46.5% #50 1,796 0 9 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10
29 2011 20–14 58.8% #51 1,760 0 10 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11
30 2012 5–7 41.7% #114 1,752 0 10 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11
31 2013 36–20 64.3% #18 2,000 0 12 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12
32 2014 43–26 62.3% #17 1,998 0 12 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12
33 2015 23–20 53.5% #42 1,883 0 12 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12
34 2016 2–6 25.0% #358 1,814 0 12 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13
35 2017 6–11 35.3% #164 1,740 0 12 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15
36 2018 0–2 0.0% #201 1,684 0 12 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15
37 2019 0–1 0.0% #205 1,582 0 12 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15
39 — — — — — — — 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15
40 2022 0–1 0.0% #1043 1,502 0 12 — — — — — — —