H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Tommy Robredo vs Vincent Spadea H2H: 1-0
Tommy Robredo holds a 1–0 lead over Vincent Spadea in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tommy Robredo leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tommy Robredo won the 2006 Tokyo fourth round 6-4 7-6(9).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2006* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Tommy Robredo | 6-4 7-6(9) | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tommy Robredo | #1,059 | #5 | 2,770 | 2,048 | 523 | 351 | 59.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
| Vincent Spadea | #1,474 | #18 | 1,629 | 1,876 | 310 | 348 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Tommy Robredo | Vincent Spadea | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1999 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #244 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #303 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #75 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #30 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #54 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #21 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #88 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #13 | 1,823 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #42 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #19 | 1,849 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #20 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 49–26 | 65.3% | #7 | 1,868 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 3–23 | 11.5% | #213 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 48–25 | 65.8% | #10 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #125 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,882 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #67 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #16 | 1,903 | 0 | 9 | 2003 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #29 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #50 | 1,796 | 0 | 9 | 2004 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #20 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #51 | 1,760 | 0 | 10 | 2005 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #75 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #114 | 1,752 | 0 | 10 | 2006 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #73 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #18 | 2,000 | 0 | 12 | 2007 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #77 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #17 | 1,998 | 0 | 12 | 2008 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #76 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #42 | 1,883 | 0 | 12 | 2009 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #295 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #358 | 1,814 | 0 | 12 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1517 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #164 | 1,740 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,684 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,582 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1043 | 1,502 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |