H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Tommy Robredo vs Younes El Aynaoui H2H: 2-1
Tommy Robredo holds a 2–1 lead over Younes El Aynaoui in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Tommy Robredo leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tommy Robredo won the 2005 Canada Masters third round 7-6(4) 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
MAR
Age 54
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2005* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Tommy Robredo | 7-6(4) 7-6(6) | Younes El Aynaoui | Match data |
| Jul 13, 2002* | Bastad | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Younes El Aynaoui | 6-2 6-2 | Tommy Robredo | Match data |
| Apr 14, 2001* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Tommy Robredo | 3-6 6-3 7-6(4) | Younes El Aynaoui | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tommy Robredo | #1,059 | #5 | 2,770 | 2,048 | 523 | 351 | 59.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
| Younes El Aynaoui | #1,592 | #14 | 1,635 | 1,923 | 243 | 219 | 52.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tommy Robredo | Younes El Aynaoui | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1999 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #244 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #351 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #30 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #311 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #21 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #51 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #13 | 1,823 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 15–27 | 35.7% | #117 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #19 | 1,849 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 49–26 | 65.3% | #7 | 1,868 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #70 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 48–25 | 65.8% | #10 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #237 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,882 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #45 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #16 | 1,903 | 0 | 9 | 1999 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #33 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2010 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #50 | 1,796 | 0 | 9 | 2000 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #25 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2011 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #51 | 1,760 | 0 | 10 | 2001 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2012 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #114 | 1,752 | 0 | 10 | 2002 | 42–25 | 62.7% | #22 | 1,773 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2013 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #18 | 2,000 | 0 | 12 | 2003 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #14 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 2014 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #17 | 1,998 | 0 | 12 | 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #644 | 1,739 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 2015 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #42 | 1,883 | 0 | 12 | 2005 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #228 | 1,597 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | 2016 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #358 | 1,814 | 0 | 12 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #189 | 1,610 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | 2017 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #164 | 1,740 | 0 | 12 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #167 | 1,617 | 0 | 5 |
| 36 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,684 | 0 | 12 | 2008 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #201 | 1,688 | 0 | 5 |
| 37 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,582 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #720 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 |
| 40 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1043 | 1,502 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |