H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Tony Roche vs Ion Tiriac H2H: 2-0
Tony Roche holds a 2–0 lead over Ion Tiriac in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tony Roche leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tony Roche won the 1978 Australian Open second round 6-3 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 81
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 87
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 1978* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Tony Roche | 6-3 6-0 6-3 | Ion Tiriac | Match data |
| Jan 23, 1974* | Philadelphia Wct | ATP 250 | R64 | Carpet | Tony Roche | 7-6(6) 6-2 | Ion Tiriac | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tony Roche | #166 | #8 | 0 | 2,135 | 360 | 191 | 65.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 21 |
| Ion Tiriac | #439 | #55 | 0 | 1,899 | 228 | 190 | 54.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tony Roche | Ion Tiriac | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | 1968 | 53–35 | 60.2% | — | 1,839 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1969 | 86–30 | 74.1% | — | 1,970 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1970 | 55–17 | 76.4% | — | 2,060 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1971 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,850 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1972 | 19–15 | 55.9% | — | 1,906 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1973 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,864 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1974 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #27 | 1,929 | 0 | 18 | 1968 | 60–12 | 83.3% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1975 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #12 | 1,962 | 0 | 18 | 1969 | 14–14 | 50.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 1976 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #50 | 2,016 | 0 | 20 | 1970 | 34–22 | 60.7% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 1977 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #19 | 1,918 | 0 | 20 | 1971 | 27–16 | 62.8% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | 1978 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #32 | 1,843 | 0 | 21 | 1972 | 21–25 | 45.7% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | 1979 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #166 | 1,797 | 0 | 21 | 1973 | 35–35 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,683 | 0 | 8 |
| 35 | 1980 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,807 | 0 | 21 | 1974 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,622 | 0 | 8 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #138 | 1,589 | 0 | 8 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #248 | 1,534 | 0 | 8 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #103 | 1,633 | 0 | 8 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #263 | 1,523 | 0 | 8 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #439 | 1,525 | 0 | 8 |