H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Tony Roche vs Julian Ganzabal H2H: 1-0

Tony Roche holds a 1–0 lead over Julian Ganzabal in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tony Roche leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tony Roche won the 1975 Wimbledon round of 64 6-3 6-2 6-4.

AUS Age 81 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
ARG Age 80 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tony Roche 6-3 6-2 6-4 Julian Ganzabal Match data Jun 27, 1975* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tony Roche #166 #12 0 2,138 360 191 65.3% 0 0 0 0 20 20
Julian Ganzabal #266 #73 0 1,729 53 69 43.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tony Roche Julian Ganzabal
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 1968 1–1 50.0% 1,512 0 0
22 1969 2–3 40.0% 1,519 0 0
23 1968 53–35 60.2% 1,837 0 4 1970 1–1 50.0% 1,533 0 0
24 1969 86–30 74.1% 1,962 0 11 1971 1–1 50.0% 1,546 0 0
25 1970 55–17 76.4% 2,064 0 15 1972 3–3 50.0% 1,570 0 0
26 1971 17–16 51.5% 1,887 0 15 1973 8–8 50.0% #150 1,613 0 0
27 1972 19–15 55.9% 1,939 0 16 1974 14–14 50.0% #79 1,626 0 0
28 1973 3–4 42.9% 1,888 0 16 1975 10–16 38.5% #125 1,654 0 0
29 1974 33–16 67.3% #27 1,938 0 17 1976 12–16 42.9% #94 1,609 0 0
30 1975 31–13 70.5% #12 1,975 0 17 1977 1–6 14.3% #165 1,565 0 0
31 1976 17–11 60.7% #50 2,025 0 19
32 1977 21–16 56.8% #15 1,924 0 19
33 1978 16–12 57.1% #32 1,848 0 20
34 1979 6–4 60.0% #166 1,800 0 20
35 1980 3–2 60.0% 1,812 0 20

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tony Roche Julian Ganzabal
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 1968 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1969 2 3 5 40.0%
23 1968 16 7 23 69.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 20 20 40 50.0% 1970 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1969 14 11 25 56.0% 23 4 27 85.2% 29 4 33 87.9% 20 11 31 64.5% 1971 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1970 14 5 19 73.7% 10 3 13 76.9% 25 4 29 86.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 1972 3 3 6 50.0%
26 1971 7 3 10 70.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 1973 1 1 2 50.0% 7 7 14 50.0%
27 1972 5 5 10 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1974 1 1 2 50.0% 11 10 21 52.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 1973 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1975 0 2 2 0.0% 8 11 19 42.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1974 5 3 8 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 13 7 20 65.0% 1976 3 2 5 60.0% 8 12 20 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 1975 4 4 8 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 17 4 21 81.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
31 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 2 13 84.6% 6 7 13 46.2%
32 1977 6 5 11 54.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 8 7 15 53.3%
33 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 11 4 15 73.3% 3 6 9 33.3%
34 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
35 1980 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
Career 75 48 123 61.0% 64 25 89 71.9% 133 39 172 77.3% 88 79 167 52.7% 5 7 12 41.7% 43 54 97 44.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tony Roche Julian Ganzabal
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
21 1968 1513 102.5 50.0% -0.17 -0.13
22 1969 1520 106.4 +25 42.9% -0.36 1–1 +0.04
23 1968 1838 119.8 -6 -224 -91 62.4% +0.53 7–9 (44%) -1.46 1970 1534 105.4 57.1% +0.72 +0.09
24 1969 1963 145.5 -69 +94 +182 70.1% +1.32 19–5 (79%) -3.25 1971 1547 108.7 50.0% -0.17 +0.15
25 1970 2064 155.4 -42 -27 +170 70.2% +1.38 14–6 (70%) 6–3 (67%) 105.6 -2.52 1972 1571 101.5 +39 48.0% -0.32 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 101.0 +1.16
26 1971 1887 145.0 +25 +124 +180 51.2% +0.50 7–3 (70%) 5–6 (45%) 101.5 -2.07 1973 1613 126.6 +26 48.8% +0.15 2–4 (33%) 3–5 (38%) 98.6 -0.21
27 1972 1940 149.5 -55 +101 55.1% +0.33 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 102.5 -4.39 1974 1626 124.7 +30 -79 50.0% +0.02 3–3 (50%) 3–0 (100%) 103.2 +1.83
28 1973 1889 120.6 -19 52.6% +0.16 1–4 (20%) 1–1 -0.53 1975 1655 130.5 -116 +14 -66 42.2% -0.47 4–6 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -1.21
29 1974 1938 144.4 -62 +37 +133 63.0% +1.08 10–5 (67%) 10–10 (50%) 101.3 -0.53 1976 1609 118.6 -43 -2 42.9% -0.40 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 101.0 +1.86
30 1975 1976 155.7 -118 -17 +179 67.9% +1.21 5–5 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 94.4 -2.87 1977 1566 99.3 +14 21.1% -2.58 1–0 1–1 +0.36
31 1976 2026 153.8 -147 +160 63.3% +0.82 3–6 (33%) 10–6 (63%) 98.3 -1.68
32 1977 1924 156.9 0 +133 57.3% +0.38 5–4 (56%) 6–6 (50%) 99.9 -3.97
33 1978 1848 140.5 -18 +18 +151 55.7% +0.51 5–2 (71%) 1–4 (20%) 98.8 -0.51
34 1979 1801 119.1 +161 67.9% +0.64 0–4 (0%) 3–1 (75%) 93.9 +0.98
35 1980 1812 125.2 +164 63.6% +0.09 0–1 1–0 -0.44
Career 2139 152.2 -42 +26 +143 64.1% +0.93 83–59 (58%) 51–47 (52%) 101.3 -4.32 1730 126.3 -65 +18 -73 44.6% -0.35 17–19 (47%) 17–14 (55%) 103.7 +3.26

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.