H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Trey Waltke vs John Trickey H2H: 1-0

Trey Waltke holds a 1–0 lead over John Trickey in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Trey Waltke leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Trey Waltke won the 1976 Sydney Indoor round of 64 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Trey Waltke
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
John Trickey
AUS Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Trey Waltke 6-4 6-3 John Trickey Match data Oct 20, 1976* R64 Sydney Indoor ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Trey Waltke #606 #41 0 1,822 113 178 38.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
John Trickey #826 #253 0 1,500 5 18 21.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Trey Waltke John Trickey
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1972 1–1 50.0% — 1,501 0 0 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
1974 2–5 28.6% #180 1,494 0 0 1973 1–1 50.0% — 1,483 0 0
1975 12–23 34.3% #99 1,521 0 0 1974 1–4 20.0% — 1,434 0 0
1976 14–21 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0 1975 0–1 0.0% #373 1,419 0 0
1977 18–25 41.9% #99 1,668 0 0 1976 0–3 0.0% #288 1,385 0 0
1978 7–15 31.8% #128 1,593 0 0 1977 2–4 33.3% #253 1,379 0 0
1979 6–15 28.6% #89 1,559 0 0 1979 1–2 33.3% #420 1,375 0 0
1980 27–22 55.1% #46 1,791 0 0 1980 0–2 0.0% #482 1,356 0 0
1981 13–24 35.1% #70 1,663 0 0 — — — — — — —
1982 10–14 41.7% — 1,664 0 0 — — — — — — —
1983 3–13 18.8% #98 1,546 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Trey Waltke John Trickey
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1972 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1972 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
1974 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1973 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
1975 3 3 6 50.0% 5 10 15 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 1974 — — — — — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
1976 3 4 7 42.9% 7 9 16 43.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1975 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
1977 9 5 14 64.3% 4 12 16 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1976 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
1978 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1977 — — — — — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
1979 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 6 7 14.3% 1979 — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
1980 19 10 29 65.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1980 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
1981 9 14 23 39.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1982 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1983 1 7 8 12.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 57 64 121 47.1% 21 46 67 31.3% 5 10 15 33.3% 30 58 88 34.1% Career 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 5 17 22 22.7% — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Trey Waltke John Trickey
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1972 1502 95.9 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.40 1–0 1–0 — +0.37 1972 1493 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.03
1974 1494 113.8 — — — — +66 — — 31.6% -0.84 2–2 (50%) 0–3 (0%) 97.3 +0.20 1973 1483 97.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01
1975 1521 118.1 — — — — +65 +11 — 34.9% -1.07 5–5 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 99.5 +1.92 1974 1434 91.8 — — — — — — +4 25.0% -1.42 1–1 0–1 — +0.79
1976 1617 131.3 — — — — -3 -44 — 42.2% -0.71 4–5 (44%) 6–1 (86%) 105.9 +0.26 1975 1420 103.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.67 — 0–1 — +0.11
1977 1668 136.1 — — — — +62 -128 — 42.5% -0.50 8–7 (53%) 5–6 (45%) 102.7 -2.15 1976 1385 100.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — +0.37
1978 1593 118.0 — — — — +38 -91 — 38.9% -0.63 3–7 (30%) 2–2 (50%) 96.3 +1.41 1977 1380 103.1 — — — — — — -7 37.5% -0.44 1–1 1–1 — +0.95
1979 1560 123.3 — — — — +8 -62 — 36.7% -0.63 1–8 (11%) 3–3 (50%) 93.5 +0.73 1979 1376 101.4 — — — — — — +12 28.6% -1.29 — 1–1 — +0.48
1980 1791 138.7 — — — — +1 -267 -237 51.7% +0.06 9–4 (69%) 5–6 (45%) 105.5 +2.13 1980 1356 97.9 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.29 0–1 0–1 — +0.27
1981 1663 143.6 — — — — 0 -145 — 40.2% -0.49 3–5 (38%) 4–6 (40%) 95.6 -2.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1982 1664 134.9 — — — — +12 — — 44.2% -0.40 2–3 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 102.8 -0.92 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1983 1546 113.6 — — — — +21 -84 — 25.0% -1.60 1–4 (20%) 0–2 — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 1822 136.8 — — — — +21 -74 -237 40.9% -0.59 39–50 (44%) 31–34 (48%) 100.3 +0.40 Career 1500 98.8 — — — — — — +1 24.5% -1.29 2–3 (40%) 2–6 (25%) 97.2 +13.32

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.