H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Ulrich Pinner vs Ricardo Cano H2H: 0-2

Ricardo Cano holds a 2–0 lead over Ulrich Pinner in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ricardo Cano leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Ricardo Cano won the 1976 Palma round of 32 1-6 6-2 6-2.

GER Age 72 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 2
2 main draw meetings
ARG Age 75 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ricardo Cano 1-6 6-2 6-2 Ulrich Pinner Match data Apr 21, 1976* R32 Palma ATP 250 Clay
Ricardo Cano 6-1 4-6 6-2 Ulrich Pinner Match data Nov 14, 1975* R16 Argentina Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ulrich Pinner #832 #19 0 1,893 132 118 52.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Ricardo Cano #768 #42 0 1,797 140 145 49.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ulrich Pinner Ricardo Cano
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1973 4–3 57.1% #183 1,579 0 0 1970 0–1 0.0% 1,493 0 0
20 1974 13–12 52.0% #117 1,681 0 0 1971 0–1 0.0% 1,490 0 0
21 1975 25–21 54.3% #60 1,672 0 0 1972 2–5 28.6% 1,477 0 0
22 1976 13–12 52.0% #71 1,717 0 0 1973 1–1 50.0% 1,489 0 0
23 1977 8–14 36.4% #165 1,680 0 0 1974 2–2 50.0% #274 1,503 0 0
24 1978 23–12 65.7% #35 1,795 0 1 1975 18–13 58.1% #42 1,738 0 0
25 1979 25–11 69.4% #23 1,822 0 2 1976 43–26 62.3% #51 1,732 0 0
26 1980 5–12 29.4% #167 1,711 0 2 1977 18–24 42.9% #99 1,674 0 0
27 1981 7–8 46.7% #89 1,656 0 2 1978 10–13 43.5% #81 1,632 0 0
28 1982 8–10 44.4% #90 1,660 0 2 1979 3–10 23.1% #169 1,566 0 0
29 1983 1–3 25.0% #120 1,634 0 2 1980 3–8 27.3% #73 1,543 0 0
30 1981 33–24 57.9% #62 1,716 0 0
31 1982 3–11 21.4% #91 1,608 0 0
32 1983 4–6 40.0% #219 1,580 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ulrich Pinner Ricardo Cano
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1973 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1970 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1974 10 7 17 58.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 1971 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1975 2 2 4 50.0% 20 17 37 54.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1973 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 1974 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1978 4 2 6 66.7% 19 10 29 65.5% 1975 18 13 31 58.1%
25 1979 3 2 5 60.0% 22 8 30 73.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1976 3 1 4 75.0% 38 23 61 62.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1977 1 3 4 25.0% 16 20 36 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1981 1 3 4 25.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1978 10 13 23 43.5%
28 1982 1 1 2 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 1979 3 10 13 23.1%
29 1983 1 3 4 25.0% 1980 3 8 11 27.3%
30 1981 4 1 5 80.0% 29 22 51 56.9% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 1982 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
32 1983 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
Career 13 14 27 48.1% 106 85 191 55.5% 8 8 16 50.0% 5 11 16 31.2% 9 8 17 52.9% 128 129 257 49.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ulrich Pinner Ricardo Cano
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1973 1579 108.2 +30 +6 56.0% +0.64 1–0 1–0 +0.72 1970 1494 97.5 0.0% -5.67 -0.19
20 1974 1682 132.7 +36 -162 49.2% -0.21 5–3 (63%) 3–1 (75%) -0.86 1971 1490 105.0 0.0% -4.00 -0.20
21 1975 1673 122.3 -56 0 -74 51.3% -0.31 9–5 (64%) 7–2 (78%) +3.81 1972 1477 95.2 +34 30.0% -1.45 1–1 +0.44
22 1976 1718 132.4 +8 -74 53.2% -0.10 3–5 (38%) 4–3 (57%) -0.75 1973 1490 106.6 50.0% +0.50 0–1 +0.17
23 1977 1680 130.1 -159 +31 46.0% -0.30 0–4 (0%) 2–2 (50%) -0.43 1974 1504 106.5 +29 50.0% +0.50 1–1 1–0 +0.69
24 1978 1796 136.0 -195 +8 63.4% +0.93 7–6 (54%) 5–2 (71%) +1.86 1975 1739 141.6 +46 51.9% +0.06 7–3 (70%) 3–3 (50%) -0.44
25 1979 1822 144.8 -207 +49 64.4% +0.92 7–5 (58%) 3–4 (43%) +1.48 1976 1732 133.4 -109 +26 56.2% +0.47 14–8 (64%) 7–4 (64%) +6.25
26 1980 1712 131.4 -96 +30 29.7% -1.03 2–1 (67%) 0–5 (0%) -2.11 1977 1674 138.6 -85 +10 43.4% -0.47 7–7 (50%) 6–3 (67%) -1.77
27 1981 1657 120.9 -83 +76 48.6% -0.03 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) +1.14 1978 1632 125.5 +5 44.6% -0.20 3–2 (60%) 1–1 +1.33
28 1982 1660 121.1 -69 +28 43.5% -0.33 4–3 (57%) 2–5 (29%) +0.27 1979 1567 118.1 -5 36.1% -0.89 2–6 (25%) 4–2 (67%) +0.24
29 1983 1634 113.6 +19 22.2% -1.78 0–1 -0.25 1980 1543 122.9 -2 37.0% -0.63 1–4 (20%) +0.12
30 1981 1717 140.9 -79 +17 54.5% +0.30 11–4 (73%) 7–10 (41%) +1.92
31 1982 1608 117.3 -14 +43 26.5% -1.82 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) -0.08
32 1983 1581 107.3 +48 46.4% -0.50 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) +0.87
Career 1893 138.3 -115 +24 -118 52.1% +0.06 40–35 (53%) 30–26 (54%) 103.9 +1.95 1797 137.7 -81 +21 47.7% -0.16 51–43 (54%) 33–30 (52%) 106.0 +3.30

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.