H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Van Winitsky vs Dick Stockton H2H: 1-2
Dick Stockton holds a 2–1 lead over Van Winitsky in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Dick Stockton leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Dick Stockton won the 1982 South Orange fourth round 6-3 3-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 67
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 75
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 1982* | South Orange | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Dick Stockton | 6-3 3-6 7-5 | Van Winitsky | Match data |
| Aug 25, 1978* | Cleveland | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Van Winitsky | 2-6 7-5 6-4 | Dick Stockton | Match data |
| Sep 29, 1977* | San Francisco | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Dick Stockton | 6-7 6-2 6-1 | Van Winitsky | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Van Winitsky | #834 | #35 | 0 | 1,852 | 106 | 133 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Dick Stockton | #808 | #8 | 0 | 2,122 | 386 | 267 | 59.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Van Winitsky | Dick Stockton | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #282 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #239 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1977 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #169 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1978 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #132 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1979 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #141 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1980 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #90 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 26–20 | 56.5% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1981 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #47 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #27 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1982 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #53 | 1,698 | 0 | 3 | 1974 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #15 | 1,917 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1983 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #91 | 1,646 | 0 | 3 | 1975 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #30 | 1,844 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1984 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,564 | 0 | 3 | 1976 | 58–26 | 69.0% | #15 | 1,988 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,551 | 0 | 3 | 1977 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #10 | 1,993 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,921 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #55 | 1,759 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #138 | 1,714 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #98 | 1,750 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #85 | 1,654 | 0 | 8 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #184 | 1,640 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,602 | 0 | 8 |