H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Van Winitsky vs Freddie Sauer H2H: 0-1

Freddie Sauer holds a 1–0 lead over Van Winitsky in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Freddie Sauer leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Freddie Sauer won the 1982 Indianapolis round of 64 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Van Winitsky
USA Age 67 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Freddie Sauer
RSA Age 65 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Freddie Sauer 6-3 6-0 Van Winitsky #41 Match data Aug 5, 1982* R64 Indianapolis ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Van Winitsky #834 #35 0 1,855 106 133 44.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Freddie Sauer #460 #134 0 1,639 24 31 43.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Van Winitsky Freddie Sauer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1975 1–1 50.0% #282 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1976 1–2 33.3% #239 1,527 0 0 1979 1–1 50.0% #439 1,512 0 0
18 1977 8–7 53.3% #228 1,649 0 0 1980 0–1 0.0% #390 1,488 0 0
19 1978 15–25 37.5% #132 1,591 0 0 1981 2–1 66.7% — 1,511 0 0
20 1979 6–14 30.0% #141 1,580 0 0 1982 18–20 47.4% — 1,635 0 0
21 1980 14–17 45.2% #90 1,678 0 0 1983 3–8 27.3% #134 1,583 0 0
22 1981 16–12 57.1% #47 1,719 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 1982 28–23 54.9% #53 1,699 0 3 — — — — — — —
24 1983 10–17 37.0% #91 1,647 0 3 — — — — — — —
25 1984 7–14 33.3% #133 1,565 0 3 — — — — — — —
26 1985 0–1 0.0% #331 1,552 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Van Winitsky Freddie Sauer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1975 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1976 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1979 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1977 2 1 3 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1980 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1978 4 4 8 50.0% 5 13 18 27.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1981 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1979 3 4 7 42.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1982 10 7 17 58.8% 6 10 16 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
21 1980 7 7 14 50.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1983 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1981 7 4 11 63.6% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1982 1 4 5 20.0% 17 8 25 68.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1983 6 7 13 46.2% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1984 4 5 9 44.4% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 35 38 73 47.9% 48 57 105 45.7% 2 10 12 16.7% 21 28 49 42.9% — 13 12 25 52.0% 7 14 21 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Van Winitsky Freddie Sauer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1975 1506 94.8 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — +0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1976 1527 111.1 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.71 — — — -0.15 1979 1512 97.2 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.60 1–0 — — +0.09
18 1977 1650 135.8 — — — — -35 -21 — 51.5% -0.30 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) — -1.13 1980 1488 97.9 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.75 — 1–0 — +0.23
19 1978 1592 127.5 — — — — +61 -13 -54 42.2% -0.64 6–10 (38%) 4–7 (36%) — +2.52 1981 1511 101.3 — — — — +36 — — 50.0% +0.25 2–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.60
20 1979 1581 134.0 — — — — +71 -23 — 28.3% -1.46 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — -0.14 1982 1636 119.5 — — — — +14 -85 — 48.3% -0.23 5–5 (50%) 5–4 (56%) — +2.63
21 1980 1678 132.8 — — — — -26 -25 — 47.7% -0.09 6–8 (43%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.39 1983 1584 113.0 — — — — +26 -62 — 35.5% -1.23 3–4 (43%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.32
22 1981 1720 130.7 — — — — -6 -61 — 55.4% +0.48 6–6 (50%) 2–7 (22%) — +1.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1982 1699 144.3 — — — — +20 +43 — 52.0% -0.02 12–9 (57%) 10–5 (67%) — -1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1983 1648 139.5 — — — — +22 +53 — 39.7% -0.46 6–6 (50%) 3–6 (33%) — -1.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1984 1565 117.3 — — — — +43 +76 -104 33.3% -1.02 6–3 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1985 1552 101.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1855 140.6 — — — — +21 +5 -75 44.6% -0.38 47–48 (49%) 30–36 (45%) 99.0 +0.59 — 1639 115.5 — — — — +18 -80 — 44.5% -0.55 11–9 (55%) 9–7 (56%) 106.3 +7.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.