H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Van Winitsky vs Keith Richardson H2H: 1-0

Van Winitsky holds a 1–0 lead over Keith Richardson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Van Winitsky leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Van Winitsky won the 1979 Sarasota round of 32 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Van Winitsky
USA Age 67 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Keith Richardson
USA Age 73 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Van Winitsky 6-3 6-3 Keith Richardson Match data Feb 15, 1979* R32 Sarasota ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Van Winitsky #834 #35 0 1,855 106 133 44.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Keith Richardson #126 #63 0 1,538 18 43 29.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Van Winitsky Keith Richardson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1975 1–1 50.0% #282 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1976 1–2 33.3% #239 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1977 8–7 53.3% #228 1,649 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1978 15–25 37.5% #132 1,591 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1979 6–14 30.0% #141 1,580 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1980 14–17 45.2% #90 1,678 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1981 16–12 57.1% #47 1,719 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 1982 28–23 54.9% #53 1,699 0 3 1976 2–4 33.3% #187 1,489 0 0
24 1983 10–17 37.0% #91 1,647 0 3 1977 6–13 31.6% #72 1,484 0 0
25 1984 7–14 33.3% #133 1,565 0 3 1978 3–10 23.1% #164 1,490 0 0
26 1985 0–1 0.0% #331 1,552 0 3 1979 7–16 30.4% #126 1,519 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Van Winitsky Keith Richardson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1975 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1976 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1977 2 1 3 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1978 4 4 8 50.0% 5 13 18 27.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1979 3 4 7 42.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1980 7 7 14 50.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1981 7 4 11 63.6% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1982 1 4 5 20.0% 17 8 25 68.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 1976 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 1983 6 7 13 46.2% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 1977 1 3 4 25.0% 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1984 4 5 9 44.4% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1978 — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 5 5 0.0%
26 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 3 8 11 27.3% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 35 38 73 47.9% 48 57 105 45.7% 2 10 12 16.7% 21 28 49 42.9% — 5 14 19 26.3% 12 21 33 36.4% — — — — 1 8 9 11.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Van Winitsky Keith Richardson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1975 1506 94.8 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — +0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1976 1527 111.1 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.71 — — — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1977 1650 135.8 — — — — -35 -21 — 51.5% -0.30 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) — -1.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1978 1592 127.5 — — — — +61 -13 -54 42.2% -0.64 6–10 (38%) 4–7 (36%) — +2.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1979 1581 134.0 — — — — +71 -23 — 28.3% -1.46 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1980 1678 132.8 — — — — -26 -25 — 47.7% -0.09 6–8 (43%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1981 1720 130.7 — — — — -6 -61 — 55.4% +0.48 6–6 (50%) 2–7 (22%) — +1.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1982 1699 144.3 — — — — +20 +43 — 52.0% -0.02 12–9 (57%) 10–5 (67%) — -1.05 1976 1489 101.3 — — — — +38 — — 38.5% -0.77 0–1 0–1 — +0.68
24 1983 1648 139.5 — — — — +22 +53 — 39.7% -0.46 6–6 (50%) 3–6 (33%) — -1.74 1977 1484 122.1 — — — — +43 +36 — 34.8% -0.83 4–4 (50%) 2–5 (29%) — +1.26
25 1984 1565 117.3 — — — — +43 +76 -104 33.3% -1.02 6–3 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.48 1978 1491 119.0 — — — — +2 +48 — 26.7% -1.40 2–2 (50%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.02
26 1985 1552 101.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.06 1979 1519 119.5 — — — — -27 +21 — 36.8% -0.96 2–5 (29%) 2–1 (67%) — +1.04
Career — 1855 140.6 — — — — +21 +5 -75 44.6% -0.38 47–48 (49%) 30–36 (45%) 99.0 +0.59 — 1539 121.5 — — — — +2 +34 — 34.2% -0.99 8–12 (40%) 5–10 (33%) 96.4 +4.85

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.