H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Van Winitsky vs Leo Palin H2H: 0-1
Leo Palin holds a 1–0 lead over Van Winitsky in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Leo Palin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Leo Palin won the 1980 Montreal / Toronto second round 6-4 2-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 67
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FIN
Age 69
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 1980* | Montreal / Toronto | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Leo Palin | 6-4 2-6 6-2 | Van Winitsky | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Van Winitsky | #834 | #35 | 0 | 1,852 | 106 | 133 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Leo Palin | #904 | #92 | 0 | 1,559 | 28 | 60 | 31.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Van Winitsky | Leo Palin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #282 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #239 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1977 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #169 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #399 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1978 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #132 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1979 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #141 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #332 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1980 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #90 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #236 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1981 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #47 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #135 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1982 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #53 | 1,698 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #197 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1983 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #91 | 1,646 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #197 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1984 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,564 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #99 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,551 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #216 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #234 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |