H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Van Winitsky vs Manuel Orantes H2H: 1-1
Van Winitsky and Manuel Orantes are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Van Winitsky leads 1–0 on clay, while Manuel Orantes leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Van Winitsky won the 1984 Nice third round 6-1 1-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 67
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 77
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 1984* | Nice | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Van Winitsky | 6-1 1-6 6-1 | Manuel Orantes | Match data |
| Sep 23, 1977* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Manuel Orantes | 5-7 7-5 6-1 | Van Winitsky | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Van Winitsky | #834 | #35 | 0 | 1,852 | 106 | 133 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Manuel Orantes | #798 | #2 | 0 | 2,229 | 696 | 286 | 70.9% | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 34 | 38 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Van Winitsky | Manuel Orantes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #282 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #239 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1977 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #169 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1978 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #132 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 30–19 | 61.2% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1979 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #141 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 24–10 | 70.6% | — | 1,809 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1980 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #90 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 21–8 | 72.4% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1981 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #47 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 36–18 | 66.7% | — | 1,939 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1982 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #53 | 1,698 | 0 | 3 | 1972 | 70–20 | 77.8% | — | 1,998 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 1983 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #91 | 1,646 | 0 | 3 | 1973 | 68–23 | 74.7% | #7 | 1,858 | 0 | 15 |
| 25 | 1984 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,564 | 0 | 3 | 1974 | 65–30 | 68.4% | #11 | 1,946 | 0 | 15 |
| 26 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,551 | 0 | 3 | 1975 | 89–18 | 83.2% | #5 | 2,052 | 1 | 23 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 77–17 | 81.9% | #4 | 2,181 | 1 | 30 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 63–21 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,062 | 1 | 33 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 47–18 | 72.3% | #12 | 2,026 | 1 | 35 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #19 | 1,895 | 1 | 36 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #58 | 1,877 | 1 | 36 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #46 | 1,847 | 1 | 37 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #42 | 1,870 | 1 | 38 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #72 | 1,711 | 1 | 38 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,634 | 1 | 38 |