H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Van Winitsky vs Mike Estep H2H: 1-0
Van Winitsky holds a 1–0 lead over Mike Estep in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Van Winitsky leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Van Winitsky won the 1981 Tokyo Outdoor second round 6-7 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 67
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 77
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 1981* | Tokyo Outdoor | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Van Winitsky | 6-7 6-4 6-0 | Mike Estep | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Van Winitsky | #834 | #35 | 0 | 1,852 | 106 | 133 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Mike Estep | #409 | #59 | 0 | 1,760 | 120 | 184 | 39.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Van Winitsky | Mike Estep | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #282 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #239 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1977 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #169 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1978 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #132 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 3–12 | 20.0% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1979 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #141 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1980 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #90 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1981 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #47 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 13–13 | 50.0% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1982 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #53 | 1,698 | 0 | 3 | 1973 | 26–31 | 45.6% | #75 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1983 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #91 | 1,646 | 0 | 3 | 1974 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #98 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1984 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,564 | 0 | 3 | 1975 | 15–27 | 35.7% | #106 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,551 | 0 | 3 | 1976 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #81 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #212 | 1,638 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #203 | 1,643 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #203 | 1,570 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #93 | 1,541 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |