H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Van Winitsky vs Raul Ramirez H2H: 2-2
Van Winitsky and Raul Ramirez are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Van Winitsky leads 2–1 on clay, while Raul Ramirez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Van Winitsky won the 1982 Guaruja quarterfinal 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 67
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
MEX
Age 73
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 1982* | Guaruja | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Van Winitsky | 6-3 7-6 | Raul Ramirez | Match data |
| Aug 10, 1978* | Colombus | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Van Winitsky | 2-6 7-6 6-4 | Raul Ramirez | Match data |
| Jul 26, 1978* | Washington | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Raul Ramirez | 7-6 6-3 | Van Winitsky | Match data |
| Feb 2, 1978* | Mexico City Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Raul Ramirez | 6-3 4-6 6-0 | Van Winitsky | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Van Winitsky | #834 | #35 | 0 | 1,852 | 106 | 133 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Raul Ramirez | #744 | #4 | 0 | 2,146 | 531 | 261 | 67.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 20 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Van Winitsky | Raul Ramirez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #282 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #239 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1977 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #169 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1978 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #132 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1979 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #141 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #26 | 1,874 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1980 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #90 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 69–35 | 66.3% | #19 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1981 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #47 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 67–29 | 69.8% | #13 | 1,983 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1982 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #53 | 1,698 | 0 | 3 | 1976 | 96–33 | 74.4% | #5 | 2,054 | 0 | 12 |
| 24 | 1983 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #91 | 1,646 | 0 | 3 | 1977 | 65–25 | 72.2% | #8 | 1,984 | 0 | 14 |
| 25 | 1984 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,564 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 70–29 | 70.7% | #8 | 1,949 | 0 | 16 |
| 26 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,551 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #40 | 1,878 | 0 | 17 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #35 | 1,789 | 0 | 18 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #32 | 1,870 | 0 | 18 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 28–13 | 68.3% | #26 | 1,809 | 0 | 19 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #74 | 1,837 | 0 | 20 |