H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Vasek Pospisil vs Horacio Zeballos H2H: 0-1
Horacio Zeballos holds a 1–0 lead over Vasek Pospisil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Horacio Zeballos leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Horacio Zeballos won the 2013 Roland Garros first round 7-6(9) 6-4 6-7(4) 2-6 8-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 36
Right-Handed
194 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 41
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2013* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Horacio Zeballos | 7-6(9) 6-4 6-7(4) 2-6 8-6 | Vasek Pospisil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vasek Pospisil | #1,265 | #25 | 1,359 | 1,958 | 122 | 161 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Horacio Zeballos | #841 | #39 | 1,027 | 1,876 | 87 | 131 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Vasek Pospisil | Horacio Zeballos | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2011 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #119 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2012 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #125 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2013 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #32 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2014 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #53 | 1,808 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #39 | 1,869 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #110 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #133 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #109 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #108 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #85 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #70 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #56 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2019 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #149 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #123 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2020 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #61 | 1,926 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2021 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #133 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #71 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2022 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #98 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #173 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #733 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1265 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |