H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Vasek Pospisil vs Marc Gicquel H2H: 1-0
Vasek Pospisil holds a 1–0 lead over Marc Gicquel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Vasek Pospisil leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Vasek Pospisil won the 2013 Wimbledon first round 6-3 6-2 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 36
Right-Handed
194 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 49
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2013* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Vasek Pospisil | 6-3 6-2 7-6(3) | Marc Gicquel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vasek Pospisil | #1,265 | #25 | 1,359 | 1,958 | 122 | 161 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marc Gicquel | #857 | #37 | 1,448 | 1,785 | 92 | 113 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Vasek Pospisil | Marc Gicquel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2011 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #119 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2012 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #125 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2013 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #32 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2014 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #53 | 1,808 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2015 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #39 | 1,869 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #223 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #133 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2017 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #108 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #170 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #70 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #123 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #149 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #50 | 1,750 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2020 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #61 | 1,926 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #70 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2021 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #133 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #54 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2022 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #98 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #58 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #151 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #733 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1265 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #152 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #120 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #342 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |