H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Vasek Pospisil vs Rajeev Ram H2H: 1-0
Vasek Pospisil holds a 1–0 lead over Rajeev Ram in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Vasek Pospisil leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vasek Pospisil won the 2014 Washington third round 6-0 7-6(8).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 36
Right-Handed
194 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 42
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2017* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Vasek Pospisil | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Rajeev Ram | Match data |
| Jul 31, 2014* | Washington | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Vasek Pospisil | 6-0 7-6(8) | Rajeev Ram | Match data |
| Jan 3, 2012* | Chennai | ATP 250 | Q3 | Hard | Vasek Pospisil | 6-1 6-7(2) 6-3 | Rajeev Ram | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vasek Pospisil | #1,265 | #25 | 1,359 | 1,958 | 122 | 161 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rajeev Ram | #1,076 | #56 | 826 | 1,747 | 57 | 94 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Vasek Pospisil | Rajeev Ram | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #536 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #437 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #297 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #119 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #195 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #125 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #32 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,417 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #53 | 1,808 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #190 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #39 | 1,869 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #79 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2016 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #133 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #184 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2017 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #108 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #149 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2018 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #70 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #132 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2019 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #149 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #127 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2020 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #61 | 1,926 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #139 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2021 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #133 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #89 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2022 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #98 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #129 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #353 | 1,582 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #733 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1265 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |