H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:15 UTC
Vasek Pospisil vs Thomas Fabbiano
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Vasek Pospisil vs Thomas Fabbiano.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 36
Right-Handed
194 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 37
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vasek Pospisil | #1,265 | #25 | 1,359 | 1,958 | 122 | 161 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thomas Fabbiano | #1,768 | #70 | 715 | 1,748 | 27 | 62 | 30.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Vasek Pospisil | Thomas Fabbiano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #371 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #119 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #125 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2013 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #32 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2014 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #53 | 1,808 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #39 | 1,869 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2016 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #133 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #108 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #124 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #70 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #73 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #149 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2020 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #61 | 1,926 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #114 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2021 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #133 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2022 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #98 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #317 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #733 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1265 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |