H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Victor Amaya vs Ken Rosewall H2H: 0-1
Ken Rosewall holds a 1–0 lead over Victor Amaya in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ken Rosewall leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ken Rosewall won the 1976 Sydney Outdoor third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 72
Left-Handed
201 cm / 6'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 91
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 1976* | Sydney Outdoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Ken Rosewall | 6-3 6-3 | Victor Amaya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victor Amaya | #739 | #15 | 0 | 1,988 | 187 | 173 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Ken Rosewall | #255 | #2 | 0 | 2,231 | 541 | 195 | 73.5% | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 40 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Victor Amaya | Ken Rosewall | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1973 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #223 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1974 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #124 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1975 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #96 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1976 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #105 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1977 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1978 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #37 | 1,755 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1979 | 44–24 | 64.7% | #29 | 1,861 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1980 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #16 | 1,849 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1981 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #85 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1982 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #56 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1983 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #73 | 1,583 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 45–12 | 78.9% | — | 1,856 | 1 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 49–21 | 70.0% | — | 1,941 | 1 | 8 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 72–21 | 77.4% | — | 2,083 | 2 | 14 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 80–24 | 76.9% | — | 2,154 | 3 | 22 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 61–15 | 80.3% | — | 2,107 | 4 | 29 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 65–17 | 79.3% | #6 | 2,102 | 4 | 34 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 28–8 | 77.8% | #9 | 2,106 | 4 | 34 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #6 | 1,994 | 4 | 37 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #13 | 1,974 | 4 | 39 |
| 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 39–20 | 66.1% | #12 | 1,975 | 4 | 40 |
| 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #34 | 1,808 | 4 | 40 |
| 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #207 | 1,746 | 4 | 40 |
| 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #255 | 1,746 | 4 | 40 |