H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Victor Pecci vs Ion Tiriac H2H: 1-1
Victor Pecci and Ion Tiriac are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Victor Pecci leads 1–0 on clay, while Ion Tiriac leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Victor Pecci won the 1977 Rome fourth round 7-5 2-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PAR
Age 70
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 87
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 1977* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Victor Pecci | 7-5 2-6 6-4 | Ion Tiriac | Match data |
| Feb 19, 1977* | Ocean City | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Ion Tiriac | (def.) | Victor Pecci | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victor Pecci | #666 | #9 | 0 | 2,085 | 354 | 244 | 59.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Ion Tiriac | #439 | #55 | 0 | 1,899 | 228 | 190 | 54.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Victor Pecci | Ion Tiriac | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1974 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #318 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1975 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1976 | 46–29 | 61.3% | #34 | 1,813 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1977 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #39 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1978 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #46 | 1,874 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1979 | 56–19 | 74.7% | #11 | 1,991 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1980 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #29 | 1,837 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1981 | 48–20 | 70.6% | #16 | 1,820 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1982 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,699 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1983 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #56 | 1,703 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1984 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #38 | 1,774 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1985 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #110 | 1,607 | 0 | 10 | 1968 | 60–12 | 83.3% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1986 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #140 | 1,577 | 0 | 10 | 1969 | 14–14 | 50.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 1987 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #256 | 1,545 | 0 | 10 | 1970 | 34–22 | 60.7% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 27–16 | 62.8% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 21–25 | 45.7% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 35–35 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,683 | 0 | 8 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,622 | 0 | 8 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #138 | 1,589 | 0 | 8 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #248 | 1,534 | 0 | 8 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #103 | 1,633 | 0 | 8 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #263 | 1,523 | 0 | 8 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #439 | 1,525 | 0 | 8 |