H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 14:15 UTC
Victor Pecci vs Jay Lapidus H2H: 0-1
Jay Lapidus holds a 1–0 lead over Victor Pecci in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jay Lapidus leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jay Lapidus won the 1985 Cincinnati second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PAR
Age 70
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 67
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 1985* | Cincinnati | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jay Lapidus | 6-4 6-4 | Victor Pecci | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victor Pecci | #666 | #9 | 0 | 2,085 | 354 | 244 | 59.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Jay Lapidus | #621 | #34 | 0 | 1,798 | 76 | 106 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Victor Pecci | Jay Lapidus | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1974 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #318 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1975 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1976 | 46–29 | 61.3% | #34 | 1,813 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1977 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #39 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #283 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1978 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #46 | 1,874 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #283 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1979 | 56–19 | 74.7% | #11 | 1,991 | 0 | 6 | 1982 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #40 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1980 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #29 | 1,837 | 0 | 7 | 1983 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #81 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1981 | 48–20 | 70.6% | #16 | 1,820 | 0 | 9 | 1984 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #65 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1982 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,699 | 0 | 9 | 1985 | 11–25 | 30.6% | #150 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1983 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #56 | 1,703 | 0 | 10 | 1986 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #145 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1984 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #38 | 1,774 | 0 | 10 | 1987 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #234 | 1,551 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1985 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #110 | 1,607 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1986 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #140 | 1,577 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1987 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #256 | 1,545 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |