H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Victor Pecci vs Pat Cramer H2H: 2-0
Victor Pecci holds a 2–0 lead over Pat Cramer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Victor Pecci leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Victor Pecci won the 1976 Wimbledon first round 6-3 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PAR
Age 70
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 1976* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Victor Pecci | 6-3 6-3 6-4 | Pat Cramer | Match data |
| May 6, 1976* | Florence | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Victor Pecci | 6-1 6-2 | Pat Cramer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victor Pecci | #666 | #9 | 0 | 2,085 | 354 | 244 | 59.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Pat Cramer | #389 | #95 | 0 | 1,668 | 62 | 103 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Victor Pecci | Pat Cramer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1974 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #318 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1975 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1976 | 46–29 | 61.3% | #34 | 1,813 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1977 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #39 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | 1968 | 5–2 | 71.4% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1978 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #46 | 1,874 | 0 | 3 | 1969 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1979 | 56–19 | 74.7% | #11 | 1,991 | 0 | 6 | 1970 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1980 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #29 | 1,837 | 0 | 7 | 1971 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1981 | 48–20 | 70.6% | #16 | 1,820 | 0 | 9 | 1972 | 18–19 | 48.6% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1982 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,699 | 0 | 9 | 1973 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #106 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1983 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #56 | 1,703 | 0 | 10 | 1974 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #160 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1984 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #38 | 1,774 | 0 | 10 | 1975 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1985 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #110 | 1,607 | 0 | 10 | 1976 | 2–20 | 9.1% | #191 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1986 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #140 | 1,577 | 0 | 10 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #196 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1987 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #256 | 1,545 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #389 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 |