H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Victor Pecci vs Patrick Proisy H2H: 2-1
Victor Pecci holds a 2–1 lead over Patrick Proisy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Victor Pecci leads 2–0 on clay, while Patrick Proisy leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patrick Proisy won the 1978 Paris Indoor fourth round 6-3 2-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PAR
Age 70
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 76
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 1978* | Paris Indoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Patrick Proisy | 6-3 2-6 6-4 | Victor Pecci | Match data |
| Jul 7, 1977* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Victor Pecci | 6-4 6-2 | Patrick Proisy | Match data |
| Aug 20, 1976* | Toronto | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Victor Pecci | 6-3 6-4 | Patrick Proisy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victor Pecci | #666 | #9 | 0 | 2,085 | 354 | 244 | 59.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Patrick Proisy | #232 | #23 | 0 | 1,876 | 220 | 193 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Victor Pecci | Patrick Proisy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1974 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #318 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1975 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1976 | 46–29 | 61.3% | #34 | 1,813 | 0 | 2 | 1970 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1977 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #39 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | 1971 | 27–18 | 60.0% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1978 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #46 | 1,874 | 0 | 3 | 1972 | 36–21 | 63.2% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1979 | 56–19 | 74.7% | #11 | 1,991 | 0 | 6 | 1973 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #41 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1980 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #29 | 1,837 | 0 | 7 | 1974 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #69 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1981 | 48–20 | 70.6% | #16 | 1,820 | 0 | 9 | 1975 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1982 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,699 | 0 | 9 | 1976 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #104 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1983 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #56 | 1,703 | 0 | 10 | 1977 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #44 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1984 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #38 | 1,774 | 0 | 10 | 1978 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1985 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #110 | 1,607 | 0 | 10 | 1979 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #93 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1986 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #140 | 1,577 | 0 | 10 | 1980 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #158 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1987 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #256 | 1,545 | 0 | 10 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 |