H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Victor Pecci vs Roscoe Tanner H2H: 1-3
Roscoe Tanner holds a 3–1 lead over Victor Pecci in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Roscoe Tanner leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Roscoe Tanner won the 1981 Sydney Indoor quarterfinal 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PAR
Age 70
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 74
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 1981* | Sydney Indoor | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Roscoe Tanner | 6-4 6-4 | Victor Pecci | Match data |
| Jun 14, 1980* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | QF | Grass | Victor Pecci | 6-3 5-7 6-4 | Roscoe Tanner | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1978* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Roscoe Tanner | 6-3 4-6 7-6 | Victor Pecci | Match data |
| Jun 27, 1975* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Roscoe Tanner | 6-3 6-4 9-8 | Victor Pecci | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victor Pecci | #666 | #9 | 0 | 2,085 | 354 | 244 | 59.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Roscoe Tanner | #789 | #4 | 0 | 2,158 | 595 | 298 | 66.6% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Victor Pecci | Roscoe Tanner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1974 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #318 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 0–9 | 0.0% | — | 1,417 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1975 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 16–10 | 61.5% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1976 | 46–29 | 61.3% | #34 | 1,813 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 29–14 | 67.4% | — | 1,911 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1977 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #39 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 45–30 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1978 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #46 | 1,874 | 0 | 3 | 1974 | 66–28 | 70.2% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1979 | 56–19 | 74.7% | #11 | 1,991 | 0 | 6 | 1975 | 65–24 | 73.0% | #9 | 1,965 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1980 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #29 | 1,837 | 0 | 7 | 1976 | 70–28 | 71.4% | #11 | 2,012 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1981 | 48–20 | 70.6% | #16 | 1,820 | 0 | 9 | 1977 | 52–30 | 63.4% | #15 | 1,880 | 1 | 11 |
| 26 | 1982 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,699 | 0 | 9 | 1978 | 59–24 | 71.1% | #11 | 1,935 | 1 | 13 |
| 27 | 1983 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #56 | 1,703 | 0 | 10 | 1979 | 61–19 | 76.2% | #5 | 2,025 | 1 | 15 |
| 28 | 1984 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #38 | 1,774 | 0 | 10 | 1980 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #13 | 1,993 | 1 | 16 |
| 29 | 1985 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #110 | 1,607 | 0 | 10 | 1981 | 51–22 | 69.9% | #12 | 1,901 | 1 | 17 |
| 30 | 1986 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #140 | 1,577 | 0 | 10 | 1982 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,779 | 1 | 17 |
| 31 | 1987 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #256 | 1,545 | 0 | 10 | 1983 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #36 | 1,872 | 1 | 17 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #249 | 1,679 | 1 | 17 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #794 | 1,661 | 1 | 17 |