H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Vijay Amritraj vs James Chico Hagey H2H: 1-0
Vijay Amritraj holds a 1–0 lead over James Chico Hagey in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Vijay Amritraj leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Vijay Amritraj won the 1977 Springfield third round 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
IND
Age 72
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 1977* | Springfield | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Vijay Amritraj | 7-6 6-2 | James Chico Hagey | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vijay Amritraj | #1,178 | #18 | 69 | 2,005 | 390 | 294 | 57.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 16 |
| James Chico Hagey | #662 | #72 | 0 | 1,558 | 18 | 50 | 26.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Vijay Amritraj | James Chico Hagey | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1970 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 1972 | 9–13 | 40.9% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #188 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 48–28 | 63.2% | #39 | 1,810 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #238 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #29 | 1,945 | 0 | 6 | 1976 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #73 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 1976 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #31 | 1,831 | 0 | 8 | 1977 | 5–23 | 17.9% | #200 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 |
| 1977 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #46 | 1,795 | 0 | 10 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #436 | 1,416 | 0 | 0 |
| 1978 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #58 | 1,763 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1979 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #34 | 1,822 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1980 | 49–24 | 67.1% | #19 | 1,982 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #20 | 1,904 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,843 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #382 | 1,685 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #42 | 1,704 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #80 | 1,698 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #106 | 1,685 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #221 | 1,676 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #193 | 1,660 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #280 | 1,606 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #687 | 1,542 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1178 | 1,528 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |