H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Viktor Troicki vs Daniel Munoz de la Nava H2H: 1-0
Viktor Troicki holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Munoz de la Nava in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Viktor Troicki leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Viktor Troicki won the 2016 Australian Open first round 4-6 4-6 6-1 7-6(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 40
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 44
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2016* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Viktor Troicki | 4-6 4-6 6-1 7-6(4) 6-3 | Daniel Munoz de la Nava | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viktor Troicki | #1,433 | #12 | 2,015 | 2,008 | 268 | 256 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Daniel Munoz de la Nava | #1,384 | #68 | 732 | 1,761 | 9 | 28 | 24.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Viktor Troicki | Daniel Munoz de la Nava | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #211 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2007 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #127 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2008 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2009 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,803 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2010 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #28 | 1,935 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2011 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #22 | 1,846 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #38 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #75 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2014 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #101 | 1,903 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #147 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2015 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #22 | 1,844 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2016 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #29 | 1,895 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #171 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2017 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #55 | 1,814 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #194 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2018 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #205 | 1,647 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2019 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,635 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,634 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #351 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 2021 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #232 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |