H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Viktor Troicki vs George Bastl H2H: 1-0
Viktor Troicki holds a 1–0 lead over George Bastl in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Viktor Troicki leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Viktor Troicki won the 2008 Zagreb third round 6-3 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 40
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 51
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2008* | Zagreb | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Viktor Troicki | 6-3 7-6(3) | George Bastl | Match data |
| May 29, 2006 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Q1 | Clay | Viktor Troicki | 6-7(4) 6-2 6-4 | George Bastl | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viktor Troicki | #1,433 | #12 | 2,015 | 2,008 | 268 | 256 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| George Bastl | #953 | #71 | 569 | 1,657 | 47 | 85 | 35.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Viktor Troicki | George Bastl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #211 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2007 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #127 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2009 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,803 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #194 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #28 | 1,935 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #81 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #22 | 1,846 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #105 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #38 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #115 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #75 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2014 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #101 | 1,903 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2015 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #22 | 1,844 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2016 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #29 | 1,895 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #128 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2017 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #55 | 1,814 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #173 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2018 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #205 | 1,647 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #464 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2019 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,635 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #233 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,634 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #523 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 2021 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #232 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |