H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Viktor Troicki vs Lukas Rosol H2H: 4-2

Viktor Troicki holds a 4–2 lead over Lukas Rosol in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Lukas Rosol leads 2–1 on clay, while Viktor Troicki leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Viktor Troicki won the 2016 Shanghai Masters second round 6-2 6-4.

SRB Age 40 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
4 2
6 main draw meetings
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 15, 2019* Australian Open Grand Slam Q2 Q Hard Viktor Troicki #200 7-6(3) 6-1 Lukas Rosol #143 Match data
Oct 11, 2016* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Viktor Troicki #31 6-2 6-4 Lukas Rosol #94 Match data
Oct 17, 2014* Vienna ATP 500 R16 Hard Viktor Troicki #127 6-3 6-2 Lukas Rosol #31 Match data
May 14, 2013* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Viktor Troicki #42 3-6 6-1 6-4 Lukas Rosol #33 Match data
Apr 27, 2013* Bucharest ATP 250 QF Clay Lukas Rosol #48 6-3 6-1 Viktor Troicki #46 Match data
Jul 19, 2012* Hamburg ATP 500 R32 Clay Lukas Rosol #107 5-7 6-3 6-4 Viktor Troicki #31 Match data
Jan 4, 2012* Doha ATP 250 R32 Hard Viktor Troicki #22 6-4 7-6(4) Lukas Rosol #70 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Viktor Troicki #1,433 #12 2,015 2,008 268 256 51.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Lukas Rosol #1,777 #26 1,290 1,921 110 148 42.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Viktor Troicki Lukas Rosol
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2006 1–1 50.0% #211 1,496 0 0
21 2007 5–7 41.7% #127 1,634 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #271 1,507 0 0
22 2008 19–19 50.0% #57 1,786 0 0 2008 1–2 33.3% #182 1,535 0 0
23 2009 27–27 50.0% #29 1,803 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #148 1,562 0 0
24 2010 36–25 59.0% #28 1,935 0 1 2010 0–2 0.0% #164 1,575 0 0
25 2011 34–24 58.6% #22 1,846 0 1 2011 5–13 27.8% #70 1,576 0 0
26 2012 21–26 44.7% #38 1,769 0 1 2012 17–18 48.6% #73 1,748 0 0
27 2013 16–17 48.5% #75 1,823 0 1 2013 21–24 46.7% #47 1,742 0 1
28 2014 8–4 66.7% #101 1,903 0 1 2014 28–26 51.9% #31 1,798 0 2
29 2015 33–27 55.0% #22 1,844 0 2 2015 19–28 40.4% #55 1,846 0 2
30 2016 33–27 55.0% #29 1,895 0 3 2016 14–22 38.9% #113 1,726 0 2
31 2017 23–28 45.1% #55 1,814 0 3 2017 2–3 40.0% #203 1,671 0 2
32 2018 6–13 31.6% #205 1,647 0 3 2018 2–2 50.0% #142 1,703 0 2
33 2019 4–4 50.0% #158 1,635 0 3 2019 1–3 25.0% #180 1,660 0 2
34 2020 1–3 25.0% #201 1,634 0 3 2020 0–1 0.0% #199 1,658 0 2
35 2021 1–4 20.0% #232 1,643 0 3
36 2022 0–2 0.0% #216 1,588 0 2