H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Viktor Troicki vs Lukas Rosol H2H: 4-2

Viktor Troicki holds a 4–2 lead over Lukas Rosol in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Lukas Rosol leads 2–1 on clay, while Viktor Troicki leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Viktor Troicki won the 2016 Shanghai Masters first round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Viktor Troicki
SRB Age 40 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Lukas Rosol
CZE Age 41 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Viktor Troicki #200 7-6(3) 6-1 Lukas Rosol #143 Match data Jan 15, 2019* Q2 Q Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Viktor Troicki #31 6-2 6-4 Lukas Rosol #94 Match data Oct 11, 2016* R64 Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Viktor Troicki #127 6-3 6-2 Lukas Rosol #31 Match data Oct 17, 2014* R16 Vienna Open ATP 250 Hard
Viktor Troicki #42 3-6 6-1 6-4 Lukas Rosol #33 Match data May 14, 2013* R64 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Lukas Rosol #48 6-3 6-1 Viktor Troicki #46 Match data Apr 27, 2013* QF Tiriac Open ATP 250 Clay
Lukas Rosol #107 5-7 6-3 6-4 Viktor Troicki #31 Match data Jul 19, 2012* R32 Hamburg Open ATP 500 Clay
Viktor Troicki #22 6-4 7-6(4) Lukas Rosol #70 Match data Jan 4, 2012* R32 Qatar Open ATP 250 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Viktor Troicki #1,433 #12 2,015 2,006 270 259 51.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Lukas Rosol #1,777 #26 1,290 1,920 110 150 42.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Viktor Troicki Lukas Rosol
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2006 1–1 50.0% #211 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2007 5–7 41.7% #127 1,634 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #271 1,507 0 0
22 2008 19–19 50.0% #57 1,791 0 0 2008 1–2 33.3% #182 1,536 0 0
23 2009 27–27 50.0% #29 1,805 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #148 1,563 0 0
24 2010 36–25 59.0% #28 1,925 0 1 2010 0–2 0.0% #164 1,576 0 0
25 2011 34–24 58.6% #22 1,846 0 1 2011 5–13 27.8% #70 1,577 0 0
26 2012 21–27 43.8% #38 1,766 0 1 2012 17–18 48.6% #73 1,749 0 0
27 2013 18–18 50.0% #75 1,824 0 1 2013 21–25 45.7% #47 1,737 0 1
28 2014 8–4 66.7% #101 1,903 0 1 2014 28–26 51.9% #31 1,787 0 2
29 2015 33–27 55.0% #22 1,847 0 2 2015 19–28 40.4% #55 1,845 0 2
30 2016 33–28 54.1% #29 1,896 0 3 2016 14–23 37.8% #113 1,721 0 2
31 2017 23–28 45.1% #55 1,814 0 3 2017 2–3 40.0% #203 1,670 0 2
32 2018 6–13 31.6% #205 1,668 0 3 2018 2–2 50.0% #142 1,702 0 2
33 2019 4–4 50.0% #158 1,643 0 3 2019 1–3 25.0% #180 1,661 0 2
34 2020 1–3 25.0% #201 1,648 0 3 2020 0–1 0.0% #199 1,658 0 2
35 2021 1–4 20.0% #232 1,650 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — 2022 0–2 0.0% #216 1,588 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Viktor Troicki Lukas Rosol
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 2006 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2008 14 12 26 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2008 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 2009 19 17 36 52.8% 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2010 28 17 45 62.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2011 24 17 41 58.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2011 2 8 10 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — —
26 2012 13 17 30 43.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2012 6 10 16 37.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 4 2 6 66.7%
27 2013 3 7 10 30.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 2013 14 17 31 45.2% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2014 6 3 9 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2014 10 15 25 40.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 2015 19 17 36 52.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 2015 12 16 28 42.9% 6 9 15 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
30 2016 27 20 47 57.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2016 10 15 25 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 2017 16 19 35 45.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 2017 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
32 2018 5 10 15 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 2019 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2019 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 2020 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
35 2021 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 179 168 347 51.6% 58 60 118 49.2% 33 31 64 51.6% — 57 92 149 38.3% 45 45 90 50.0% 8 13 21 38.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 521/529 of Viktor Troicki's and 258/260 of Lukas Rosol's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Viktor Troicki Lukas Rosol
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2006 2/2 8.0 1.0 61.4% 70.4% 53.0% 43.3% 63.9% 63.8% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 12/12 4.2 3.7 59.0% 64.4% 42.5% 46.9% 45.4% 55.6% 37.8% 2007 1/1 1.0 6.0 52.3% 62.2% 48.8% 66.7% 28.6% 55.8% 34.2%
22 2008 37/38 6.2 2.2 61.7% 73.4% 51.5% 51.7% 37.9% 65.0% 37.2% 2008 3/3 2.7 3.7 49.5% 69.2% 42.0% 41.0% 77.8% 55.6% 38.6%
23 2009 54/54 6.9 2.6 57.6% 70.1% 44.7% 60.8% 46.7% 58.8% 36.4% 2009 1/1 10.0 3.0 63.6% 74.3% 40.0% 66.7% 60.0% 61.8% 33.0%
24 2010 59/61 9.2 2.9 60.1% 75.0% 50.6% 59.4% 46.1% 64.9% 41.3% 2010 2/2 4.0 5.0 49.9% 70.6% 44.8% 77.8% 5.0% 57.9% 26.8%
25 2011 58/58 7.9 2.4 58.9% 72.9% 47.2% 63.6% 47.1% 62.2% 39.9% 2011 18/18 7.5 3.9 57.0% 68.7% 45.7% 63.3% 33.5% 59.0% 34.2%
26 2012 47/48 8.1 2.3 59.7% 70.0% 44.0% 52.2% 42.4% 59.3% 36.5% 2012 35/35 7.2 3.1 58.6% 74.4% 50.9% 63.0% 45.9% 64.7% 32.6%
27 2013 36/36 6.7 2.1 59.6% 70.5% 47.5% 49.6% 43.4% 61.2% 37.5% 2013 46/46 6.9 3.3 58.0% 71.9% 48.3% 61.9% 35.5% 62.0% 35.2%
28 2014 12/12 9.1 2.2 55.0% 79.4% 52.5% 59.5% 45.9% 66.9% 40.2% 2014 53/54 6.3 2.7 57.3% 71.5% 49.5% 55.0% 40.6% 62.0% 34.8%
29 2015 60/60 10.0 2.0 62.9% 74.5% 49.8% 57.1% 41.3% 65.5% 36.2% 2015 47/47 5.7 4.1 56.9% 72.2% 49.6% 52.8% 37.2% 62.3% 33.1%
30 2016 60/61 8.5 2.3 61.2% 74.2% 49.9% 56.0% 40.2% 64.7% 36.7% 2016 36/37 6.9 3.2 60.3% 71.1% 51.0% 64.2% 40.0% 63.0% 31.8%
31 2017 49/51 6.6 3.2 60.7% 71.2% 46.7% 53.9% 41.1% 61.8% 35.4% 2017 5/5 10.4 4.4 62.4% 80.1% 50.7% 51.4% 37.2% 68.0% 26.4%
32 2018 19/19 8.2 3.2 63.5% 69.8% 41.2% 53.1% 33.5% 59.3% 33.5% 2018 4/4 8.3 3.5 64.3% 71.7% 50.7% 70.4% 20.0% 64.3% 29.3%
33 2019 8/8 8.0 4.3 62.0% 72.5% 51.7% 53.0% 46.4% 64.7% 33.0% 2019 4/4 6.5 4.3 64.0% 68.8% 50.0% 48.2% 38.8% 62.0% 30.0%
34 2020 3/4 8.3 1.3 72.0% 67.1% 48.2% 57.3% 32.3% 61.5% 31.7% 2020 1/1 3.0 4.0 38.1% 81.3% 53.8% 50.0% — 64.3% 20.8%
35 2021 5/5 7.8 1.2 63.5% 74.1% 55.0% 44.1% 19.9% 66.4% 26.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 2/2 6.0 3.5 72.3% 65.1% 40.9% 47.8% 72.2% 57.7% 29.7%
Career — 521/529 7.9 2.5 60.4% 72.4% 47.9% 56.1% 42.7% 62.6% 37.2% — 258/260 6.6 3.4 58.1% 71.9% 49.3% 58.9% 39.1% 62.4% 33.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Viktor Troicki Lukas Rosol
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 2006 1497 108.2 +2.42 +2.63 1.020 50.3% — — — 40.0% +0.60 1–0 0–3 (0%) — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 1634 117.7 -4.28 -0.04 0.852 47.0% -40 +23 — 44.4% -0.89 3–2 (60%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.12 2007 1508 110.5 -1.57 +3.07 0.774 45.7% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.23
22 2008 1791 139.5 +1.49 +1.42 1.065 50.4% +8 -175 -178 49.4% -0.01 4–6 (40%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.41 2008 1536 106.6 -1.01 -0.08 0.870 47.4% — — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.18
23 2009 1806 148.2 -2.68 +0.14 0.884 48.1% +16 -130 -137 48.4% -0.29 9–5 (64%) 7–8 (47%) — -2.24 2009 1563 107.4 +0.04 -2.26 0.865 47.9% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.02
24 2010 1925 159.4 +1.84 +4.42 1.176 52.7% +14 -165 -279 57.0% +0.59 8–9 (47%) 9–12 (43%) — -1.68 2010 1576 107.5 -1.31 -0.97 0.638 44.3% — — — 16.7% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.05
25 2011 1847 157.5 +0.04 +2.75 1.056 51.0% +36 +1 -155 58.3% +0.38 5–7 (42%) 9–11 (45%) — +1.82 2011 1577 125.6 -2.74 -2.58 0.833 47.0% 0 +90 — 33.3% -1.04 2–3 (40%) 4–8 (33%) — +0.09
26 2012 1766 146.1 -2.61 -0.08 0.896 48.1% -2 +12 -4 45.3% -0.24 10–8 (56%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.30 2012 1750 140.7 +2.12 -3.63 0.925 49.1% -109 -26 -70 46.1% -0.24 6–4 (60%) 7–13 (35%) — -1.04
27 2013 1825 139.7 -1.42 -0.04 0.966 49.1% -123 +24 -40 51.1% -0.08 5–3 (63%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.52 2013 1737 143.6 -0.85 -1.68 0.926 49.0% -16 -11 -87 48.3% -0.21 6–9 (40%) 6–9 (40%) — +1.39
28 2014 1904 142.7 +2.91 +1.97 1.214 53.2% -67 -35 — 62.5% +0.75 1–1 3–2 (60%) — -0.99 2014 1788 149.9 -1.20 -0.94 0.916 48.7% -81 +76 -127 47.6% -0.40 8–6 (57%) 18–10 (64%) — -1.09
29 2015 1847 149.3 +0.59 +0.86 1.051 50.6% -26 -34 +98 51.5% +0.18 14–8 (64%) 14–17 (45%) — +1.04 2015 1846 149.4 -0.94 -1.88 0.879 48.2% -26 -21 -218 44.4% -0.39 8–10 (44%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.23
30 2016 1896 159.7 +1.47 +0.63 1.039 50.5% +8 -14 -47 50.6% -0.07 14–7 (67%) 18–7 (72%) — +0.26 2016 1722 143.9 -0.35 -3.49 0.860 47.9% +13 +53 — 40.2% -0.66 7–7 (50%) 12–9 (57%) — -1.96
31 2017 1814 148.1 -1.84 -0.08 0.926 48.5% +24 +20 -93 43.4% -0.58 9–5 (64%) 13–8 (62%) — -1.56 2017 1670 114.3 +0.43 -2.44 0.822 47.8% +16 — — 50.0% -0.07 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.08
32 2018 1668 123.1 -3.95 -1.30 0.822 46.3% +48 +95 — 33.3% -0.92 5–5 (50%) 5–9 (36%) — -0.36 2018 1702 116.1 -0.71 -0.20 0.821 47.8% — — — 45.5% -0.55 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — -0.52
33 2019 1643 117.7 +0.21 -1.72 0.935 48.8% +10 — +142 47.8% -0.39 2–1 (67%) 3–0 (100%) — +0.39 2019 1661 113.9 -1.09 -2.40 0.789 46.4% +3 — — 38.5% -1.15 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.37
34 2020 1648 116.8 -1.33 -1.24 0.824 47.6% +41 — — 37.5% -0.25 1–1 0–1 — +0.12 2020 1659 107.1 -0.51 +0.11 0.583 41.1% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.30
35 2021 1650 110.9 +0.71 -3.52 0.779 46.0% — — — 30.8% -0.92 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.04 2021 1546 101.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1588 106.8 -2.09 -4.12 0.702 43.9% — — — 28.6% -1.43 0–1 1–1 — +0.05
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1540 92.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2006 151.3 -0.39 +1.02 0.995 49.8% +6 -32 -45 49.9% -0.05 91–69 (57%) 106–105 (50%) 103.5 -0.72 — 1920 139.1 -0.59 -2.12 0.886 48.3% -33 +29 -121 43.7% -0.49 41–47 (47%) 70–66 (51%) 103.0 -1.41

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.