H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Viktor Troicki vs Marc Gicquel H2H: 0-2
Marc Gicquel holds a 2–0 lead over Viktor Troicki in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marc Gicquel leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marc Gicquel won the 2009 Washington third round 3-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 40
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 49
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2009* | Washington | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Marc Gicquel | 3-0 (ret.) | Viktor Troicki | Match data |
| May 27, 2008* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Marc Gicquel | 6-4 6-3 4-6 7-5 | Viktor Troicki | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viktor Troicki | #1,433 | #12 | 2,015 | 2,008 | 268 | 256 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Marc Gicquel | #857 | #37 | 1,448 | 1,785 | 92 | 113 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Viktor Troicki | Marc Gicquel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #211 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2007 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #127 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2008 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2009 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,803 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2010 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #28 | 1,935 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2011 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #22 | 1,846 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #223 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #38 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2013 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #75 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #170 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2014 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #101 | 1,903 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #123 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2015 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #22 | 1,844 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #50 | 1,750 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2016 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #29 | 1,895 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #70 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2017 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #55 | 1,814 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #54 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2018 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #205 | 1,647 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #58 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2019 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,635 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #151 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,634 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 2021 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #232 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #152 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #120 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #342 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |