H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Viktor Troicki vs Marcos Baghdatis H2H: 3-5

Marcos Baghdatis holds a 5–3 lead over Viktor Troicki in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Marcos Baghdatis leads 5–2 on hard courts, while Viktor Troicki leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marcos Baghdatis won the 2018 Dubai third round 7-5 6-2.

SRB Age 40 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 5
8 main draw meetings
CYP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 28, 2018* Dubai ATP 500 R32 Hard Marcos Baghdatis #112 7-5 6-2 Viktor Troicki #66 Match data
May 4, 2017* Istanbul ATP 250 R32 Clay Viktor Troicki #38 7-5 6-4 Marcos Baghdatis #60 Match data
Sep 30, 2016* Chengdu ATP 250 R16 Hard Viktor Troicki #32 6-3 4-6 6-2 Marcos Baghdatis #36 Match data
Feb 24, 2016* Dubai ATP 500 R32 Hard Marcos Baghdatis #57 7-6(2) 6-2 Viktor Troicki #22 Match data
Nov 3, 2011* Basel ATP 500 R32 Hard Marcos Baghdatis #59 4-6 7-6(8) 6-2 Viktor Troicki #17 Match data
Oct 1, 2011* Kuala Lumpur ATP 250 SF Hard Marcos Baghdatis #60 6-3 6-1 Viktor Troicki #15 Match data
Oct 24, 2010* Moscow ATP 250 F Hard Viktor Troicki #43 3-6 6-4 6-3 Marcos Baghdatis #19 Match data
Jan 15, 2010* Sydney ATP 250 R16 Hard Marcos Baghdatis #42 7-5 6-3 Viktor Troicki #29 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Viktor Troicki #1,433 #12 2,015 2,008 268 256 51.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Marcos Baghdatis #179 #8 2,111 1,952 324 272 54.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Viktor Troicki Marcos Baghdatis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2004 1–1 50.0% #159 1,559 0 0
20 2006 1–1 50.0% #211 1,496 0 0 2005 11–12 47.8% #55 1,694 0 0
21 2007 5–7 41.7% #127 1,634 0 0 2006 33–20 62.3% #12 1,842 0 1
22 2008 19–19 50.0% #57 1,786 0 0 2007 44–22 66.7% #16 1,937 0 2
23 2009 27–27 50.0% #29 1,803 0 0 2008 12–12 50.0% #98 1,815 0 2
24 2010 36–25 59.0% #28 1,935 0 1 2009 18–16 52.9% #42 1,810 0 3
25 2011 34–24 58.6% #22 1,846 0 1 2010 41–27 60.3% #20 1,852 0 4
26 2012 21–26 44.7% #38 1,769 0 1 2011 26–27 49.1% #44 1,844 0 4
27 2013 16–17 48.5% #75 1,823 0 1 2012 31–24 56.4% #36 1,897 0 4
28 2014 8–4 66.7% #101 1,903 0 1 2013 14–22 38.9% #87 1,804 0 4
29 2015 33–27 55.0% #22 1,844 0 2 2014 7–11 38.9% #85 1,703 0 4
30 2016 33–27 55.0% #29 1,895 0 3 2015 26–19 57.8% #46 1,869 0 4
31 2017 23–28 45.1% #55 1,814 0 3 2016 26–23 53.1% #36 1,884 0 4
32 2018 6–13 31.6% #205 1,647 0 3 2017 18–16 52.9% #102 1,839 0 4
33 2019 4–4 50.0% #158 1,635 0 3 2018 12–17 41.4% #124 1,723 0 4
34 2020 1–3 25.0% #201 1,634 0 3 2019 4–3 57.1% #179 1,740 0 4
35 2021 1–4 20.0% #232 1,643 0 3