H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Viktor Troicki vs Rajeev Ram H2H: 1-0
Viktor Troicki holds a 1–0 lead over Rajeev Ram in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Viktor Troicki leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Viktor Troicki won the 2015 US Open second round 7-6(10) 6-4 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 40
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 42
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2015* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Viktor Troicki | 7-6(10) 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Rajeev Ram | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viktor Troicki | #1,433 | #12 | 2,015 | 2,008 | 268 | 256 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Rajeev Ram | #1,076 | #56 | 826 | 1,747 | 57 | 94 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Viktor Troicki | Rajeev Ram | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #536 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #437 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #211 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #297 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #127 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #195 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,803 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,417 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #28 | 1,935 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #190 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #22 | 1,846 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #79 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #38 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #184 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2013 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #75 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #149 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2014 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #101 | 1,903 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #132 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2015 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #22 | 1,844 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #127 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2016 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #29 | 1,895 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #139 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2017 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #55 | 1,814 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #89 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2018 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #205 | 1,647 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #129 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2019 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,635 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #353 | 1,582 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,634 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2021 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #232 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |