H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Viktor Troicki vs Teymuraz Gabashvili H2H: 5-1

Viktor Troicki holds a 5–1 lead over Teymuraz Gabashvili in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Viktor Troicki leads 3–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Viktor Troicki won the 2016 Italian Open first round 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Viktor Troicki
SRB Age 40 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Teymuraz Gabashvili
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Viktor Troicki #24 6-4 6-1 Teymuraz Gabashvili #60 Match data May 10, 2016* R64 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Viktor Troicki #22 3-6 6-4 6-4 Teymuraz Gabashvili #50 Match data Jan 16, 2016* SF Sydney International ATP 250 Hard
Teymuraz Gabashvili #57 6-2 6-3 Viktor Troicki #24 Match data Oct 23, 2015* R16 Moscow ATP 250 Hard
Viktor Troicki #28 6-3 6-1 Teymuraz Gabashvili #80 Match data Jan 6, 2011* R16 Qatar Open ATP 250 Hard
Viktor Troicki #26 3-6 6-2 6-4 Teymuraz Gabashvili #74 Match data Jul 22, 2009* R32 Hamburg Open ATP 500 Clay
Viktor Troicki #139 6-7(3) 6-3 6-4 Teymuraz Gabashvili #96 Match data Sep 13, 2007* R32 China Open International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Viktor Troicki #1,433 #12 2,015 2,006 270 259 51.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Teymuraz Gabashvili #1,373 #43 1,226 1,838 110 196 35.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Viktor Troicki Teymuraz Gabashvili
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2004 0–2 0.0% #258 1,482 0 0
20 2006 1–1 50.0% #211 1,496 0 0 2005 2–4 33.3% #132 1,460 0 0
21 2007 5–7 41.7% #127 1,634 0 0 2006 6–12 33.3% #112 1,518 0 0
22 2008 19–19 50.0% #57 1,791 0 0 2007 10–28 26.3% #125 1,600 0 0
23 2009 27–27 50.0% #29 1,805 0 0 2008 13–13 50.0% #65 1,663 0 0
24 2010 36–25 59.0% #28 1,925 0 1 2009 12–24 33.3% #106 1,558 0 0
25 2011 34–24 58.6% #22 1,846 0 1 2010 10–16 38.5% #80 1,689 0 0
26 2012 21–27 43.8% #38 1,766 0 1 2011 10–19 34.5% #138 1,658 0 0
27 2013 18–18 50.0% #75 1,824 0 1 2012 1–4 20.0% #182 1,581 0 0
28 2014 8–4 66.7% #101 1,903 0 1 2013 2–2 50.0% #76 1,626 0 0
29 2015 33–27 55.0% #22 1,847 0 2 2014 18–26 40.9% #67 1,737 0 0
30 2016 33–28 54.1% #29 1,896 0 3 2015 16–21 43.2% #50 1,775 0 0
31 2017 23–28 45.1% #55 1,814 0 3 2016 10–22 31.2% #138 1,628 0 0
32 2018 6–13 31.6% #205 1,668 0 3 2017 0–3 0.0% #237 1,535 0 0
33 2019 4–4 50.0% #158 1,643 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2020 1–3 25.0% #201 1,648 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2021 1–4 20.0% #232 1,650 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Viktor Troicki Teymuraz Gabashvili
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2006 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
21 2007 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 2 3 5 40.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
22 2008 14 12 26 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2007 9 17 26 34.6% 0 6 6 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2009 19 17 36 52.8% 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2008 7 8 15 46.7% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — —
24 2010 28 17 45 62.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2009 5 12 17 29.4% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
25 2011 24 17 41 58.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2010 6 12 18 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2012 13 17 30 43.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2011 4 11 15 26.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2013 3 7 10 30.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2012 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2014 6 3 9 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2013 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2015 19 17 36 52.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 10 4 14 71.4% — — — — 2014 9 14 23 39.1% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2016 27 20 47 57.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2015 9 15 24 37.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2017 16 19 35 45.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2016 5 10 15 33.3% 4 9 13 30.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
32 2018 5 10 15 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2017 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 179 168 347 51.6% 58 60 118 49.2% 33 31 64 51.6% — — — — — 60 109 169 35.5% 41 63 104 39.4% 6 17 23 26.1% 3 7 10 30.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 521/529 of Viktor Troicki's and 301/306 of Teymuraz Gabashvili's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Viktor Troicki Teymuraz Gabashvili
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 2/2 5.0 3.5 56.2% 66.0% 28.1% 48.4% 50.0% 49.4% 32.5%
20 2006 2/2 8.0 1.0 61.4% 70.4% 53.0% 43.3% 63.9% 63.8% 37.0% 2005 6/6 5.0 2.7 52.8% 70.5% 47.3% 34.2% 38.1% 59.4% 37.5%
21 2007 12/12 4.2 3.7 59.0% 64.4% 42.5% 46.9% 45.4% 55.6% 37.8% 2006 18/18 5.3 3.2 55.1% 72.1% 53.6% 52.0% 32.9% 63.4% 34.2%
22 2008 37/38 6.2 2.2 61.7% 73.4% 51.5% 51.7% 37.9% 65.0% 37.2% 2007 38/38 5.6 4.8 54.2% 72.1% 45.6% 56.5% 44.0% 60.0% 31.5%
23 2009 54/54 6.9 2.6 57.6% 70.1% 44.7% 60.8% 46.7% 58.8% 36.4% 2008 25/26 4.6 3.2 60.7% 70.7% 47.9% 63.6% 48.7% 62.0% 35.9%
24 2010 59/61 9.2 2.9 60.1% 75.0% 50.6% 59.4% 46.1% 64.9% 41.3% 2009 35/36 4.7 5.5 55.0% 67.4% 45.1% 57.1% 41.8% 57.5% 33.6%
25 2011 58/58 7.9 2.4 58.9% 72.9% 47.2% 63.6% 47.1% 62.2% 39.9% 2010 26/26 5.3 3.7 55.5% 73.9% 51.4% 58.3% 36.9% 63.7% 34.9%
26 2012 47/48 8.1 2.3 59.7% 70.0% 44.0% 52.2% 42.4% 59.3% 36.5% 2011 28/29 2.9 3.6 59.1% 64.8% 49.8% 45.4% 32.9% 58.5% 35.4%
27 2013 36/36 6.7 2.1 59.6% 70.5% 47.5% 49.6% 43.4% 61.2% 37.5% 2012 5/5 2.2 3.0 60.3% 66.8% 46.6% 53.5% 37.9% 60.2% 39.8%
28 2014 12/12 9.1 2.2 55.0% 79.4% 52.5% 59.5% 45.9% 66.9% 40.2% 2013 4/4 5.3 2.5 60.4% 64.5% 55.9% 66.9% 27.0% 61.0% 35.8%
29 2015 60/60 10.0 2.0 62.9% 74.5% 49.8% 57.1% 41.3% 65.5% 36.2% 2014 43/44 3.1 3.0 59.2% 67.2% 47.4% 55.2% 37.8% 58.9% 36.9%
30 2016 60/61 8.5 2.3 61.2% 74.2% 49.9% 56.0% 40.2% 64.7% 36.7% 2015 37/37 5.4 4.4 56.7% 72.4% 51.7% 65.8% 36.9% 63.4% 35.4%
31 2017 49/51 6.6 3.2 60.7% 71.2% 46.7% 53.9% 41.1% 61.8% 35.4% 2016 31/32 4.3 4.1 57.8% 71.0% 46.5% 56.8% 39.4% 60.7% 35.5%
32 2018 19/19 8.2 3.2 63.5% 69.8% 41.2% 53.1% 33.5% 59.3% 33.5% 2017 3/3 5.7 3.0 55.8% 73.1% 45.8% 43.5% 19.7% 60.8% 33.6%
33 2019 8/8 8.0 4.3 62.0% 72.5% 51.7% 53.0% 46.4% 64.7% 33.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 3/4 8.3 1.3 72.0% 67.1% 48.2% 57.3% 32.3% 61.5% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 5/5 7.8 1.2 63.5% 74.1% 55.0% 44.1% 19.9% 66.4% 26.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 521/529 7.9 2.5 60.4% 72.4% 47.9% 56.1% 42.7% 62.6% 37.2% — 301/306 4.5 3.9 57.0% 69.9% 48.3% 56.5% 39.0% 60.5% 34.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Viktor Troicki Teymuraz Gabashvili
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1483 99.7 -2.62 -3.21 0.643 42.2% — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 0–1 — -0.04
20 2006 1497 108.2 +2.42 +2.63 1.020 50.3% — — — 40.0% +0.60 1–0 0–3 (0%) — -0.15 2005 1460 104.7 -1.72 +0.46 0.923 48.0% +39 — — 40.0% -0.73 1–2 (33%) — — -0.05
21 2007 1634 117.7 -4.28 -0.04 0.852 47.0% -40 +23 — 44.4% -0.89 3–2 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 103.7 +0.12 2006 1519 124.5 +0.17 -2.07 0.934 48.3% +30 -56 — 39.1% -0.56 4–5 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 104.6 +0.08
22 2008 1791 139.5 +1.49 +1.42 1.065 50.4% +8 -175 -178 49.4% -0.01 4–6 (40%) 6–6 (50%) 98.7 -1.41 2007 1601 122.2 -2.72 -4.45 0.786 46.1% +27 -120 -80 32.2% -1.19 5–9 (36%) 6–7 (46%) 94.0 +0.15
23 2009 1806 148.2 -2.68 +0.14 0.884 48.1% +16 -130 -137 48.4% -0.29 9–5 (64%) 7–8 (47%) 105.0 -2.24 2008 1663 125.3 -1.37 -0.76 0.945 49.3% +18 -115 — 51.6% -0.16 3–5 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 102.1 -0.30
24 2010 1925 159.4 +1.84 +4.42 1.176 52.7% +14 -165 -279 57.0% +0.59 8–9 (47%) 9–12 (43%) 98.7 -1.68 2009 1558 127.3 -4.68 -2.56 0.791 46.0% 0 +87 -54 35.2% -1.04 6–6 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.6 -1.33
25 2011 1847 157.5 +0.04 +2.75 1.056 51.0% +36 +1 -155 58.3% +0.38 5–7 (42%) 9–11 (45%) 94.6 +1.82 2010 1690 131.4 +0.51 -0.82 0.960 49.6% -79 +40 — 45.1% -0.13 2–7 (22%) 4–9 (31%) 91.9 -0.07
26 2012 1766 146.1 -2.61 -0.08 0.896 48.1% -2 +12 -4 45.3% -0.24 10–8 (56%) 9–9 (50%) 100.6 +0.30 2011 1659 129.5 -3.46 -1.02 0.853 46.9% -19 -3 -119 37.5% -1.06 4–6 (40%) 9–5 (64%) 102.0 -1.17
27 2013 1825 139.7 -1.42 -0.04 0.966 49.1% -123 +24 -40 51.1% -0.08 5–3 (63%) 6–6 (50%) 103.3 +0.52 2012 1582 110.0 -1.43 -0.89 1.001 50.1% +36 — — 30.8% -0.69 0–1 1–1 — +0.59
28 2014 1904 142.7 +2.91 +1.97 1.214 53.2% -67 -35 — 62.5% +0.75 1–1 3–2 (60%) — -0.99 2013 1626 123.4 +0.15 -1.01 0.917 48.3% +2 — — 36.4% -0.27 2–0 0–2 — +0.01
29 2015 1847 149.3 +0.59 +0.86 1.051 50.6% -26 -34 +98 51.5% +0.18 14–8 (64%) 14–17 (45%) 101.0 +1.04 2014 1738 145.9 -3.57 +0.71 0.898 48.1% -11 -21 — 42.5% -0.47 6–4 (60%) 4–8 (33%) 100.8 -0.72
30 2016 1896 159.7 +1.47 +0.63 1.039 50.5% +8 -14 -47 50.6% -0.07 14–7 (67%) 18–7 (72%) 110.5 +0.26 2015 1776 146.4 -0.48 +0.12 0.968 49.3% -81 +102 — 45.7% -0.31 5–7 (42%) 8–4 (67%) 103.2 -1.36
31 2017 1814 148.1 -1.84 -0.08 0.926 48.5% +24 +20 -93 43.4% -0.58 9–5 (64%) 13–8 (62%) 104.0 -1.56 2016 1628 128.0 -2.29 -1.28 0.903 48.3% -27 +144 -72 37.3% -0.49 3–7 (30%) 4–5 (44%) 95.2 +0.50
32 2018 1668 123.1 -3.95 -1.30 0.822 46.3% +48 +95 — 33.3% -0.92 5–5 (50%) 5–9 (36%) 96.0 -0.36 2017 1535 104.6 -1.16 -2.90 0.856 46.0% — — — 30.0% -1.50 0–2 1–1 — +0.47
33 2019 1643 117.7 +0.21 -1.72 0.935 48.8% +10 — +142 47.8% -0.39 2–1 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 103.3 +0.39 2018 1511 99.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1648 116.8 -1.33 -1.24 0.824 47.6% +41 — — 37.5% -0.25 1–1 0–1 — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1650 110.9 +0.71 -3.52 0.779 46.0% — — — 30.8% -0.92 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.04 2020 1498 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1474 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2006 151.3 -0.39 +1.02 0.995 49.8% +6 -32 -45 49.9% -0.05 91–69 (57%) 106–105 (50%) 103.5 -0.72 — 1839 133.8 -2.16 -1.30 0.885 47.9% -15 +19 -83 39.9% -0.64 41–62 (40%) 53–54 (50%) 97.0 -1.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.