H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Viktor Troicki vs Vasek Pospisil H2H: 0-1
Vasek Pospisil holds a 1–0 lead over Viktor Troicki in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Vasek Pospisil leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Vasek Pospisil won the 2015 Wimbledon fourth round 4-6 6-7(4) 6-4 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 40
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 36
Right-Handed
194 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2015* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Vasek Pospisil | 4-6 6-7(4) 6-4 6-3 6-3 | Viktor Troicki | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viktor Troicki | #1,433 | #12 | 2,015 | 2,008 | 268 | 256 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Vasek Pospisil | #1,265 | #25 | 1,359 | 1,958 | 122 | 161 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Viktor Troicki | Vasek Pospisil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #211 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2007 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #127 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #119 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #125 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,803 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #32 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #28 | 1,935 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #53 | 1,808 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #22 | 1,846 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #39 | 1,869 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #38 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #133 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #75 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #108 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2014 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #101 | 1,903 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #70 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2015 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #22 | 1,844 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #149 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2016 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #29 | 1,895 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #61 | 1,926 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2017 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #55 | 1,814 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #133 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2018 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #205 | 1,647 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #98 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2019 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,635 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,634 | 0 | 3 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #733 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 2021 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #232 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1265 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |