H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Vincent Spadea vs David Sanchez H2H: 1-1
Vincent Spadea and David Sanchez are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, David Sanchez leads 1–0 on clay, while Vincent Spadea leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vincent Spadea won the 2005 Auckland third round 6-0 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2005* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Vincent Spadea | 6-0 6-0 | David Sanchez | Match data |
| May 23, 2002* | St. Poelten | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | David Sanchez | 6-4 6-0 | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vincent Spadea | #1,474 | #18 | 1,629 | 1,876 | 310 | 348 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| David Sanchez | #1,116 | #41 | 832 | 1,730 | 87 | 119 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Vincent Spadea | David Sanchez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1993 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #303 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #262 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #75 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #196 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #54 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #88 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #74 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #42 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #60 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #20 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #50 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 2000 | 3–23 | 11.5% | #213 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #74 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 |
| 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #125 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #137 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 2002 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #67 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #29 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #20 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #75 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #73 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #77 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #76 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #295 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1517 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |