H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Vincent Spadea vs Eyal Ran H2H: 1-0

Vincent Spadea holds a 1–0 lead over Eyal Ran in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Vincent Spadea leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vincent Spadea won the 1997 Tashkent round of 16 7-5 6-7(4) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Vincent Spadea
USA Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Eyal Ran
ISR Age 53 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Vincent Spadea #114 7-5 6-7(4) 6-3 Eyal Ran #171 Match data Sep 12, 1997* R16 Tashkent World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Vincent Spadea #1,474 #18 1,629 1,876 311 350 47.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Eyal Ran #1,153 #138 315 1,530 13 30 30.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Vincent Spadea Eyal Ran
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1993 1–5 16.7% #303 1,482 0 0 1990 0–1 0.0% #732 1,483 0 0
1994 11–13 45.8% #75 1,561 0 0 1992 0–1 0.0% #319 1,474 0 0
1995 21–28 42.9% #81 1,639 0 0 1993 2–2 50.0% #187 1,506 0 0
1996 27–22 55.1% #54 1,711 0 0 1994 0–1 0.0% #257 1,501 0 0
1997 20–26 43.5% #88 1,695 0 0 1995 2–4 33.3% #160 1,492 0 0
1998 28–27 50.9% #42 1,753 0 0 1996 3–5 37.5% #154 1,506 0 0
1999 33–27 55.0% #20 1,763 0 0 1997 5–12 29.4% #193 1,472 0 0
2000 3–24 11.1% #213 1,540 0 0 1998 1–3 25.0% #230 1,465 0 0
2001 1–3 25.0% #125 1,530 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #272 1,448 0 0
2002 13–17 43.3% #67 1,622 0 0 — — — — — — —
2003 34–25 57.6% #29 1,723 0 0 — — — — — — —
2004 40–26 60.6% #20 1,783 0 1 — — — — — — —
2005 21–24 46.7% #75 1,665 0 1 — — — — — — —
2006 19–26 42.2% #73 1,626 0 1 — — — — — — —
2007 24–28 46.2% #77 1,651 0 1 — — — — — — —
2008 13–19 40.6% #76 1,643 0 1 — — — — — — —
2009 2–9 18.2% #295 1,520 0 1 — — — — — — —
2010 0–1 0.0% #1517 1,475 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Vincent Spadea Eyal Ran
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1993 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
1994 5 6 11 45.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
1995 13 12 25 52.0% 8 11 19 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1993 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
1996 15 12 27 55.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
1997 15 13 28 53.6% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1995 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
1998 19 17 36 52.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1996 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
1999 17 12 29 58.6% 13 9 22 59.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1997 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
2000 1 15 16 6.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1998 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
2001 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
2002 8 9 17 47.1% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2003 24 16 40 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2004 24 14 38 63.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2005 14 17 31 45.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2006 16 16 32 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2007 16 19 35 45.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2008 8 12 20 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2009 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 198 204 402 49.3% 68 84 152 44.7% 27 39 66 40.9% 18 23 41 43.9% Career 10 20 30 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%

Performance Progression by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 604/661 of Vincent Spadea's and 36/42 of Eyal Ran's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Vincent Spadea Eyal Ran
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
1993 6/6 2.3 4.2 49.5% 57.8% 42.6% 48.9% 47.3% 50.5% 38.6% 1992 1/1 2.0 2.0 49.2% 63.3% 38.7% 42.9% 100.0% 50.8% 28.6%
1994 19/24 2.0 2.0 56.3% 62.6% 45.0% 52.7% 37.8% 54.8% 40.6% 1993 4/4 3.3 1.3 55.6% 67.0% 57.9% 51.7% 38.7% 63.7% 41.3%
1995 43/49 3.1 1.7 57.3% 68.2% 51.1% 58.8% 44.4% 60.9% 40.7% 1994 1/1 2.0 3.0 59.8% 57.7% 48.6% 28.6% 71.4% 54.0% 38.7%
1996 42/49 3.5 1.3 61.8% 69.3% 54.4% 59.2% 44.6% 63.6% 41.2% 1995 5/6 3.4 3.6 49.5% 65.7% 49.3% 43.7% 31.3% 57.5% 43.4%
1997 38/46 3.9 2.5 55.0% 67.1% 50.9% 57.4% 48.6% 59.6% 38.0% 1996 7/8 3.9 3.1 61.1% 62.9% 46.5% 58.4% 48.0% 57.7% 44.2%
1998 47/55 2.4 1.5 66.4% 64.1% 52.2% 56.4% 46.9% 60.1% 37.8% 1997 14/17 3.9 2.3 57.8% 66.8% 46.7% 55.0% 47.8% 58.3% 33.8%
1999 53/60 4.9 1.9 53.1% 71.7% 52.3% 53.3% 48.4% 62.4% 40.6% 1998 3/4 1.0 1.7 55.1% 58.2% 45.9% 49.3% 38.9% 51.6% 40.8%
2000 22/27 3.9 4.1 51.9% 65.6% 46.4% 58.5% 42.0% 56.2% 34.0% 1999 1/1 1.0 3.0 58.3% 71.4% 40.0% 50.0% 0.0% 58.3% 25.5%
2001 3/4 3.7 7.7 52.6% 68.1% 46.9% 61.0% 28.5% 58.0% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
2002 26/30 5.0 6.2 54.9% 69.5% 51.9% 52.0% 37.4% 61.3% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
2003 56/59 3.8 4.2 54.0% 69.3% 51.6% 56.1% 54.1% 61.2% 39.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
2004 64/66 4.2 2.5 59.3% 69.0% 53.8% 61.4% 42.9% 62.6% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
2005 45/45 3.1 3.4 56.4% 68.4% 49.1% 54.2% 46.3% 60.0% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
2006 45/45 3.3 2.9 57.7% 69.1% 50.3% 58.0% 38.6% 61.2% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
2007 52/52 3.0 2.1 61.9% 66.0% 53.2% 56.9% 45.7% 61.2% 37.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
2008 31/32 3.7 3.0 58.1% 69.1% 49.9% 56.1% 45.4% 61.0% 35.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
2009 11/11 4.6 4.5 55.0% 66.0% 46.7% 50.5% 30.8% 56.7% 32.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
2010 1/1 5.0 6.0 57.7% 63.3% 36.4% 20.0% — 51.9% 19.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career 604/661 3.6 2.8 57.6% 68.0% 51.2% 56.6% 44.9% 60.7% 38.8% Career 36/43 3.3 2.5 56.6% 65.0% 47.8% 52.0% 44.6% 57.8% 38.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Vincent Spadea Eyal Ran
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1993 1483 111.6 -2.02 +0.71 0.780 44.9% +25 — — 35.7% -1.00 0–2 1–0 — -0.51 1990 1484 95.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.20
1994 1562 128.2 -4.35 +0.98 0.897 47.7% -7 -11 — 49.1% -0.12 3–4 (43%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.31 1992 1475 100.8 -0.97 -1.74 0.581 40.9% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00
1995 1640 140.5 -0.53 +2.71 1.040 50.5% +51 -56 -95 46.2% -0.02 3–8 (27%) 5–6 (45%) — -1.18 1993 1507 118.5 +2.10 +0.80 1.139 52.6% +24 — — 55.6% +0.78 0–1 — — -0.06
1996 1712 143.3 +1.24 +2.99 1.130 52.3% +32 -80 -144 55.5% +0.52 3–10 (23%) 12–13 (48%) — -0.21 1994 1501 105.1 +1.56 -1.00 0.841 46.9% — — — 0.0% -1.00 — 0–2 — -0.12
1997 1695 132.3 -1.99 +0.58 0.942 49.0% +54 -90 -177 44.2% -0.20 8–9 (47%) 8–13 (38%) — +0.15 1995 1493 108.4 -1.40 +0.32 1.023 50.6% +31 — — 35.7% -0.57 1–1 0–1 — +0.31
1998 1754 142.9 -1.19 +1.36 0.948 49.0% +12 -114 -242 48.9% -0.21 11–9 (55%) 11–7 (61%) — -1.59 1996 1507 112.1 -2.13 +2.24 1.046 51.2% +17 +14 — 45.5% +0.14 1–2 (33%) — — +0.47
1999 1764 147.3 +0.64 +3.01 1.078 51.4% 0 +23 — 52.6% +0.40 11–8 (58%) 12–17 (41%) — -2.07 1997 1473 104.6 -2.39 -2.97 0.811 46.5% +35 — — 31.6% -1.34 0–3 (0%) 5–3 (63%) — +1.41
2000 1541 116.0 -3.77 -2.37 0.776 45.7% +4 +136 -111 25.7% -1.37 2–10 (17%) 1–5 (17%) — -1.41 1998 1465 101.6 -3.18 -0.50 0.843 46.0% +36 — — 33.3% -1.11 0–1 0–1 — +0.20
2001 1530 100.5 -1.18 -1.97 0.837 46.8% +9 — — 22.2% -1.22 1–0 — — -0.11 1999 1449 95.7 -3.35 +1.13 0.611 42.6% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.25
2002 1623 124.7 -0.85 -0.17 0.959 49.0% -26 +7 -149 44.3% -0.30 5–3 (63%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.52 2000 1435 97.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2003 1724 136.8 -0.66 +1.93 1.022 50.6% +8 -47 — 51.0% +0.20 14–4 (78%) 3–11 (21%) — +3.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2004 1783 145.9 -0.01 +2.69 1.050 51.0% +7 -99 -180 57.4% +0.58 17–7 (71%) 10–14 (42%) — +0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2005 1666 133.6 -2.19 +2.07 0.982 49.7% -7 +10 +9 49.5% -0.01 7–8 (47%) 7–4 (64%) — +1.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2006 1627 135.4 -0.44 +2.72 1.054 51.1% +39 -19 -31 42.6% -0.10 6–10 (38%) 4–13 (24%) — +0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2007 1651 138.5 -1.80 +0.82 0.961 49.3% +13 -57 -80 44.9% -0.17 10–5 (67%) 10–9 (53%) — -2.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2008 1644 128.2 -2.08 -1.45 0.903 48.3% +10 -100 +32 42.9% -0.46 6–7 (46%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2009 1521 107.0 -4.53 -2.50 0.746 44.4% +14 — +119 19.2% -1.92 1–0 0–2 — +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2010 1475 95.4 -1.09 -2.14 0.406 37.6% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 1877 141.6 -1.05 +1.51 0.987 49.8% +15 -37 -86 47.2% -0.06 108–104 (51%) 98–134 (42%) 95.1 -0.06 Career 1531 111.0 -1.65 -0.67 0.909 48.3% +31 +14 — 35.0% -0.81 2–8 (20%) 5–7 (42%) 92.9 +6.19

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.