H2H data updated: 2026-10-17 00:00 UTC

Vincent Spadea vs Jared Palmer H2H: 0-1

Jared Palmer holds a 1–0 lead over Vincent Spadea in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jared Palmer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jared Palmer won the 1995 Indian Wells Open round of 64 6-4 6-4.

USA Age 52 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jared Palmer #43 6-4 6-4 Vincent Spadea #61 Match data Mar 8, 1995* R64 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Vincent Spadea #1,474 #18 1,629 1,876 311 350 47.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Jared Palmer #1,385 #35 908 1,793 69 80 46.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Vincent Spadea Jared Palmer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1988 1–2 33.3% #517 1,510 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1989 3–2 60.0% #240 1,575 0 0
18 1993 1–5 16.7% #303 1,482 0 0 1990 1–2 33.3% #564 1,567 0 0
19 1994 11–13 45.8% #75 1,561 0 0 1991 1–3 25.0% #427 1,521 0 0
20 1995 21–28 42.9% #81 1,639 0 0 1992 2–4 33.3% #149 1,536 0 0
21 1996 27–22 55.1% #54 1,711 0 0 1993 9–14 39.1% #105 1,605 0 0
22 1997 20–26 43.5% #88 1,695 0 0 1994 28–20 58.3% #36 1,790 0 1
23 1998 28–27 50.9% #42 1,753 0 0 1995 17–20 45.9% #125 1,717 0 1
24 1999 33–27 55.0% #20 1,763 0 0 1996 4–7 36.4% #214 1,651 0 1
25 2000 3–24 11.1% #213 1,540 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2001 1–3 25.0% #125 1,530 0 0 1998 0–3 0.0% #174 1,598 0 1
27 2002 13–17 43.3% #67 1,622 0 0 1999 1–1 50.0% #435 1,611 0 1
28 2003 34–25 57.6% #29 1,723 0 0 2000 2–2 50.0% #357 1,621 0 1
29 2004 40–26 60.6% #20 1,783 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2005 21–24 46.7% #75 1,665 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2006 19–26 42.2% #73 1,626 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2007 24–28 46.2% #77 1,651 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2008 13–19 40.6% #76 1,643 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2009 2–9 18.2% #295 1,520 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2010 0–1 0.0% #1517 1,475 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Vincent Spadea Jared Palmer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1993 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1994 5 6 11 45.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1991 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 1995 13 12 25 52.0% 8 11 19 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1996 15 12 27 55.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1993 2 7 9 22.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
22 1997 15 13 28 53.6% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 14 13 27 51.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
23 1998 19 17 36 52.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1995 10 10 20 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 1999 17 12 29 58.6% 13 9 22 59.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1996 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
25 2000 1 15 16 6.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2001 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2002 8 9 17 47.1% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1999 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2003 24 16 40 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2000 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2004 24 14 38 63.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 14 17 31 45.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 16 16 32 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 16 19 35 45.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2008 8 12 20 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2009 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 198 204 402 49.3% 68 84 152 44.7% 27 39 66 40.9% 18 23 41 43.9% — 37 43 80 46.2% 19 18 37 51.4% 7 11 18 38.9% 6 8 14 42.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Vincent Spadea Jared Palmer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1511 103.7 — — — — — — — 36.4% -0.45 1–1 — — +0.08
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1575 120.0 — — — — +29 — — 61.5% +0.23 0–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.46
18 1993 1483 111.6 -2.02 +0.71 0.780 44.9% +25 — — 35.7% -1.00 0–2 1–0 — -0.51 1990 1568 102.3 — — — — +32 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–0 0–1 — +0.10
19 1994 1562 128.2 -4.35 +0.98 0.897 47.7% -7 -11 — 49.1% -0.12 3–4 (43%) 3–3 (50%) 99.8 +0.31 1991 1522 96.9 — — — — — — — 36.4% -1.09 0–1 1–1 — +0.70
20 1995 1640 140.5 -0.53 +2.71 1.040 50.5% +51 -56 -95 46.2% -0.02 3–8 (27%) 5–6 (45%) 96.6 -1.18 1992 1537 116.7 — — — — +37 — — 44.4% -0.44 0–2 — — +0.01
21 1996 1712 143.3 +1.24 +2.99 1.130 52.3% +32 -80 -144 55.5% +0.52 3–10 (23%) 12–13 (48%) 94.0 -0.21 1993 1606 122.8 — — — — -14 -61 -33 47.5% -0.26 0–8 (0%) 9–6 (60%) 95.9 +0.34
22 1997 1695 132.3 -1.99 +0.58 0.942 49.0% +54 -90 -177 44.2% -0.20 8–9 (47%) 8–13 (38%) 96.7 +0.15 1994 1790 143.7 — — — — -57 -106 — 55.1% +0.46 8–7 (53%) 11–12 (48%) 105.4 -1.51
23 1998 1754 142.9 -1.19 +1.36 0.948 49.0% +12 -114 -242 48.9% -0.21 11–9 (55%) 11–7 (61%) 103.5 -1.59 1995 1717 129.7 — — — — -40 -20 -96 47.1% -0.36 7–6 (54%) 11–9 (55%) 101.6 -0.01
24 1999 1764 147.3 +0.64 +3.01 1.078 51.4% 0 +23 — 52.6% +0.40 11–8 (58%) 12–17 (41%) 96.0 -2.07 1996 1652 119.0 — — — — — -27 +6 44.1% -0.03 0–3 (0%) 1–5 (17%) 92.5 +0.12
25 2000 1541 116.0 -3.77 -2.37 0.776 45.7% +4 +136 -111 25.7% -1.37 2–10 (17%) 1–5 (17%) 87.4 -1.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2001 1530 100.5 -1.18 -1.97 0.837 46.8% +9 — — 22.2% -1.22 1–0 — — -0.11 1998 1598 96.8 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — +0.19
27 2002 1623 124.7 -0.85 -0.17 0.959 49.0% -26 +7 -149 44.3% -0.30 5–3 (63%) 6–9 (40%) 102.9 +0.52 1999 1612 106.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 0–1 — -0.30
28 2003 1724 136.8 -0.66 +1.93 1.022 50.6% +8 -47 — 51.0% +0.20 14–4 (78%) 3–11 (21%) 102.0 +3.85 2000 1621 116.8 — — — — +49 — — 50.0% +0.70 1–1 0–1 — -0.46
29 2004 1783 145.9 -0.01 +2.69 1.050 51.0% +7 -99 -180 57.4% +0.58 17–7 (71%) 10–14 (42%) 106.3 +0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 1666 133.6 -2.19 +2.07 0.982 49.7% -7 +10 +9 49.5% -0.01 7–8 (47%) 7–4 (64%) 101.6 +1.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 1627 135.4 -0.44 +2.72 1.054 51.1% +39 -19 -31 42.6% -0.10 6–10 (38%) 4–13 (24%) 89.2 +0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 1651 138.5 -1.80 +0.82 0.961 49.3% +13 -57 -80 44.9% -0.17 10–5 (67%) 10–9 (53%) 105.5 -2.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2008 1644 128.2 -2.08 -1.45 0.903 48.3% +10 -100 +32 42.9% -0.46 6–7 (46%) 5–8 (38%) 99.5 +0.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2009 1521 107.0 -4.53 -2.50 0.746 44.4% +14 — +119 19.2% -1.92 1–0 0–2 — +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2010 1475 95.4 -1.09 -2.14 0.406 37.6% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1877 141.6 -1.05 +1.51 0.987 49.8% +15 -37 -86 47.2% -0.06 108–104 (51%) 98–134 (42%) 95.1 -0.06 — 1794 135.2 — — — — -28 -66 -49 48.1% -0.12 19–31 (38%) 35–37 (49%) 97.4 -0.81

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.