H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Vincent Spadea vs John Van Lottum H2H: 1-1
Vincent Spadea and John Van Lottum are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Vincent Spadea leads 1–0 on clay, while John Van Lottum leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vincent Spadea won the 2003 Roland Garros second round 7-5 6-1 2-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 50
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2003* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Vincent Spadea | 7-5 6-1 2-6 6-1 | John Van Lottum | Match data |
| Feb 13, 1998* | San Jose | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | John Van Lottum | 7-5 6-7(2) 6-2 | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vincent Spadea | #1,474 | #18 | 1,629 | 1,876 | 310 | 348 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| John Van Lottum | — | — | — | 1,719 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Vincent Spadea | John Van Lottum | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1993 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #303 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #75 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #54 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #88 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #42 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #20 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 3–23 | 11.5% | #213 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #125 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #67 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #29 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #20 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #75 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #73 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #77 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #76 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #295 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1517 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |