H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Vincent Spadea vs Mark Woodforde H2H: 3-1
Vincent Spadea holds a 3–1 lead over Mark Woodforde in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Vincent Spadea leads 2–0 on clay, while Mark Woodforde leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Vincent Spadea won the 1999 Roland Garros first round 7-6(5) 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 60
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 1999* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Vincent Spadea | 7-6(5) 6-3 7-5 | Mark Woodforde | Match data |
| Oct 3, 1996* | Singapore | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Mark Woodforde | 7-5 6-7(4) 6-1 | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
| Jun 20, 1996* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Vincent Spadea | 6-2 7-6(4) | Mark Woodforde | Match data |
| May 9, 1996* | Pinehurst | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Vincent Spadea | 7-6(4) 6-2 | Mark Woodforde | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vincent Spadea | #1,474 | #18 | 1,629 | 1,876 | 310 | 348 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mark Woodforde | #985 | #19 | 1,291 | 1,922 | 313 | 294 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Vincent Spadea | Mark Woodforde | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1993 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #303 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #127 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #75 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #181 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #54 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,800 | 0 | 2 |
| 1997 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #88 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #75 | 1,710 | 0 | 3 |
| 1998 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #42 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 |
| 1999 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #20 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #88 | 1,631 | 0 | 3 |
| 2000 | 3–23 | 11.5% | #213 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #40 | 1,814 | 0 | 3 |
| 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #125 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #28 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 |
| 2002 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #67 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #43 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 |
| 2003 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #29 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #51 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 |
| 2004 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #20 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #27 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 |
| 2005 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #75 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #46 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 |
| 2006 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #73 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #58 | 1,747 | 0 | 4 |
| 2007 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #77 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #130 | 1,611 | 0 | 4 |
| 2008 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #76 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #321 | 1,584 | 0 | 4 |
| 2009 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #295 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1517 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |