H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Vincent Spadea vs Martin Damm Sr H2H: 1-3

Martin Damm Sr holds a 3–1 lead over Vincent Spadea in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Martin Damm Sr leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Martin Damm Sr won the 2000 Cincinnati Open round of 64 7-6(3) 3-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Vincent Spadea
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main-draw meetings
Martin Damm Sr
CZE

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Martin Damm Sr 7-6(3) 3-6 6-2 Vincent Spadea #83 Match data Aug 9, 2000* R64 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Vincent Spadea #44 6-3 6-4 6-4 Martin Damm Sr Match data Jan 24, 1999* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Martin Damm Sr 6-4 7-5 Vincent Spadea #48 Match data Jun 18, 1998* R32 Libéma Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Martin Damm Sr 7-6(4) 7-5 Vincent Spadea #91 Match data Oct 10, 1997* R16 Brisbane International Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Vincent Spadea #1,474 #18 1,629 1,876 311 350 47.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Martin Damm Sr — — — 1,731 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Vincent Spadea Martin Damm Sr
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1993 1–5 16.7% #303 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
1994 11–13 45.8% #75 1,561 0 0 — — — — — — —
1995 21–28 42.9% #81 1,639 0 0 — — — — — — —
1996 27–22 55.1% #54 1,711 0 0 — — — — — — —
1997 20–26 43.5% #88 1,695 0 0 — — — — — — —
1998 28–27 50.9% #42 1,753 0 0 — — — — — — —
1999 33–27 55.0% #20 1,763 0 0 — — — — — — —
2000 3–24 11.1% #213 1,540 0 0 — — — — — — —
2001 1–3 25.0% #125 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
2002 13–17 43.3% #67 1,622 0 0 — — — — — — —
2003 34–25 57.6% #29 1,723 0 0 — — — — — — —
2004 40–26 60.6% #20 1,783 0 1 — — — — — — —
2005 21–24 46.7% #75 1,665 0 1 — — — — — — —
2006 19–26 42.2% #73 1,626 0 1 — — — — — — —
2007 24–28 46.2% #77 1,651 0 1 — — — — — — —
2008 13–19 40.6% #76 1,643 0 1 — — — — — — —
2009 2–9 18.2% #295 1,520 0 1 — — — — — — —
2010 0–1 0.0% #1517 1,475 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Vincent Spadea Martin Damm Sr
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1993 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1994 5 6 11 45.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1995 13 12 25 52.0% 8 11 19 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1991 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
1996 15 12 27 55.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1992 6 8 14 42.9% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1997 15 13 28 53.6% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 7 11 18 38.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 6 14 57.1%
1998 19 17 36 52.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1994 7 12 19 36.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 7 11 36.4%
1999 17 12 29 58.6% 13 9 22 59.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1995 7 13 20 35.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
2000 1 15 16 6.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1996 15 13 28 53.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 13 10 23 56.5%
2001 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 10 13 23 43.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8%
2002 8 9 17 47.1% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1998 10 14 24 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
2003 24 16 40 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1999 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
2004 24 14 38 63.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 2000 6 11 17 35.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
2005 14 17 31 45.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
2006 16 16 32 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2002 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
2007 16 19 35 45.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2008 8 12 20 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2009 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 198 204 402 49.3% 68 84 152 44.7% 27 39 66 40.9% 18 23 41 43.9% Career 74 107 181 40.9% 6 28 34 17.6% 22 24 46 47.8% 51 49 100 51.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Vincent Spadea Martin Damm Sr
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1993 1483 111.6 -2.02 +0.71 0.780 44.9% +25 — — 35.7% -1.00 0–2 1–0 — -0.51 1989 1492 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.08
1994 1562 128.2 -4.35 +0.98 0.897 47.7% -7 -11 — 49.1% -0.12 3–4 (43%) 3–3 (50%) 99.8 +0.31 1990 1478 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.15
1995 1640 140.5 -0.53 +2.71 1.040 50.5% +51 -56 -95 46.2% -0.02 3–8 (27%) 5–6 (45%) 96.6 -1.18 1991 1504 104.7 — — — — +57 — — 57.1% +0.57 1–0 0–1 — +0.21
1996 1712 143.3 +1.24 +2.99 1.130 52.3% +32 -80 -144 55.5% +0.52 3–10 (23%) 12–13 (48%) 94.0 -0.21 1992 1546 125.4 — — — — +65 -88 — 35.1% -0.91 4–1 (80%) 2–5 (29%) 103.3 +0.26
1997 1695 132.3 -1.99 +0.58 0.942 49.0% +54 -90 -177 44.2% -0.20 8–9 (47%) 8–13 (38%) 96.7 +0.15 1993 1647 128.4 — — — — +28 -196 — 44.8% -0.40 6–6 (50%) 8–5 (62%) 105.4 +0.61
1998 1754 142.9 -1.19 +1.36 0.948 49.0% +12 -114 -242 48.9% -0.21 11–9 (55%) 11–7 (61%) 103.5 -1.59 1994 1630 133.5 — — — — -23 -172 +21 44.4% -0.32 3–13 (19%) 9–10 (47%) 92.4 -0.61
1999 1764 147.3 +0.64 +3.01 1.078 51.4% 0 +23 — 52.6% +0.40 11–8 (58%) 12–17 (41%) 96.0 -2.07 1995 1619 133.0 — — — — +8 — — 42.3% -0.55 9–8 (53%) 11–11 (50%) 102.9 -0.27
2000 1541 116.0 -3.77 -2.37 0.776 45.7% +4 +136 -111 25.7% -1.37 2–10 (17%) 1–5 (17%) 87.4 -1.41 1996 1709 139.5 — — — — +35 — -23 47.9% -0.08 13–8 (62%) 13–18 (42%) 102.9 +1.26
2001 1530 100.5 -1.18 -1.97 0.837 46.8% +9 — — 22.2% -1.22 1–0 — — -0.11 1997 1694 135.4 — — — — +35 -281 +7 48.3% -0.18 8–7 (53%) 16–10 (62%) 105.2 +0.62
2002 1623 124.7 -0.85 -0.17 0.959 49.0% -26 +7 -149 44.3% -0.30 5–3 (63%) 6–9 (40%) 102.9 +0.52 1998 1649 132.2 — — — — +16 — +23 42.9% -0.50 7–7 (50%) 8–11 (42%) 98.6 -0.31
2003 1724 136.8 -0.66 +1.93 1.022 50.6% +8 -47 — 51.0% +0.20 14–4 (78%) 3–11 (21%) 102.0 +3.85 1999 1578 123.5 — — — — +27 -177 +52 39.1% -0.78 1–7 (13%) 3–5 (38%) 90.9 -0.57
2004 1783 145.9 -0.01 +2.69 1.050 51.0% +7 -99 -180 57.4% +0.58 17–7 (71%) 10–14 (42%) 106.3 +0.56 2000 1615 127.5 — — — — -72 -159 +102 44.2% -0.34 7–3 (70%) 6–9 (40%) 105.2 +0.30
2005 1666 133.6 -2.19 +2.07 0.982 49.7% -7 +10 +9 49.5% -0.01 7–8 (47%) 7–4 (64%) 101.6 +1.81 2001 1514 96.3 — — — — — — +91 15.0% -1.90 — 0–2 — +0.77
2006 1627 135.4 -0.44 +2.72 1.054 51.1% +39 -19 -31 42.6% -0.10 6–10 (38%) 4–13 (24%) 89.2 +0.49 2002 1525 111.4 — — — — +15 — — 37.5% -0.75 — 1–1 — -0.13
2007 1651 138.5 -1.80 +0.82 0.961 49.3% +13 -57 -80 44.9% -0.17 10–5 (67%) 10–9 (53%) 105.5 -2.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2008 1644 128.2 -2.08 -1.45 0.903 48.3% +10 -100 +32 42.9% -0.46 6–7 (46%) 5–8 (38%) 99.5 +0.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2009 1521 107.0 -4.53 -2.50 0.746 44.4% +14 — +119 19.2% -1.92 1–0 0–2 — +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2010 1475 95.4 -1.09 -2.14 0.406 37.6% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 1877 141.6 -1.05 +1.51 0.987 49.8% +15 -37 -86 47.2% -0.06 108–104 (51%) 98–134 (42%) 95.1 -0.06 Career 1732 136.6 — — — — +17 -170 +36 43.3% -0.43 59–60 (50%) 77–88 (47%) 101.6 +0.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.