H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
Vincent Spadea vs Martin Damm Sr H2H: 1-3
Martin Damm Sr holds a 3–1 lead over Vincent Spadea in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Martin Damm Sr leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Martin Damm Sr won the 2000 Cincinnati Masters second round 7-6(3) 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2000* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Martin Damm Sr | 7-6(3) 3-6 6-2 | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
| Jan 24, 1999* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Vincent Spadea | 6-3 6-4 6-4 | Martin Damm Sr | Match data |
| Jun 18, 1998* | S Hertogenbosch | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Martin Damm Sr | 6-4 7-5 | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
| Oct 10, 1997* | Singapore | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Martin Damm Sr | 7-6(4) 7-5 | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vincent Spadea | #1,474 | #18 | 1,629 | 1,876 | 310 | 348 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Martin Damm Sr | — | — | — | 1,744 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Vincent Spadea | Martin Damm Sr | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1993 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #303 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #75 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #54 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #88 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #42 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #20 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 3–23 | 11.5% | #213 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #125 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #67 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #29 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #20 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #75 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #73 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #77 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #76 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #295 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1517 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |