H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Vincent Spadea vs Paul Goldstein H2H: 1-1
Vincent Spadea and Paul Goldstein are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Vincent Spadea leads 1–0 on grass, while Paul Goldstein leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paul Goldstein won the 2006 Las Vegas fourth round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2006* | Las Vegas | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Paul Goldstein | 6-2 6-1 | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
| Jul 9, 2005* | Newport | ATP 250 | SF | Grass | Vincent Spadea | 7-6(6) 6-2 | Paul Goldstein | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vincent Spadea | #1,474 | #18 | 1,629 | 1,876 | 310 | 348 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Paul Goldstein | #1,120 | #58 | 668 | 1,746 | 85 | 115 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Vincent Spadea | Paul Goldstein | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1993 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #303 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #781 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #75 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1219 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1011 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #54 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #432 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #88 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #189 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #42 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #89 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #20 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #81 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 3–23 | 11.5% | #213 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #125 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #182 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #67 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #107 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #29 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #190 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #20 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #67 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #75 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #70 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #73 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #166 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #77 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #76 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #295 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1517 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |