H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Vincent Spadea vs Robert Kendrick H2H: 1-2
Robert Kendrick holds a 2–1 lead over Vincent Spadea in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Robert Kendrick leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Robert Kendrick won the 2009 Los Angeles third round 6-0 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 46
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2009* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Robert Kendrick | 6-0 6-0 | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
| Jul 13, 2006* | Newport | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Robert Kendrick | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
| Feb 3, 2006* | Delray Beach | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Vincent Spadea | 6-4 6-1 | Robert Kendrick | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vincent Spadea | #1,474 | #18 | 1,629 | 1,876 | 310 | 348 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Robert Kendrick | #1,118 | #69 | 968 | 1,729 | 35 | 78 | 31.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Vincent Spadea | Robert Kendrick | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1993 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #303 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #134 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #75 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #160 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #54 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #87 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #88 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #105 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #42 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #97 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #20 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #142 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 3–23 | 11.5% | #213 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #115 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #125 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #224 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #67 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #29 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #20 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #75 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #73 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #77 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #76 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #295 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1517 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |