H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Vitas Gerulaitis vs Ricardo Cano H2H: 0-1
Ricardo Cano holds a 1–0 lead over Vitas Gerulaitis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ricardo Cano leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ricardo Cano won the 1975 Buenos Aires third round 6-4 2-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 71
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 75
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 1975* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ricardo Cano | 6-4 2-6 7-5 | Vitas Gerulaitis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vitas Gerulaitis | #796 | #3 | 0 | 2,238 | 527 | 231 | 69.5% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 26 |
| Ricardo Cano | #768 | #41 | 0 | 1,792 | 142 | 147 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Vitas Gerulaitis | Ricardo Cano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1972 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1973 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #131 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1974 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #45 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1975 | 39–14 | 73.6% | #15 | 1,946 | 0 | 3 | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1976 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #18 | 1,955 | 0 | 3 | 1972 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1977 | 60–16 | 78.9% | #4 | 2,118 | 1 | 8 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1978 | 47–14 | 77.0% | #5 | 2,155 | 1 | 11 | 1974 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #274 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1979 | 71–22 | 76.3% | #4 | 2,168 | 1 | 15 | 1975 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #42 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1980 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #9 | 2,011 | 1 | 18 | 1976 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #51 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1981 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #11 | 2,062 | 1 | 19 | 1977 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1982 | 61–15 | 80.3% | #5 | 2,052 | 1 | 24 | 1978 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #81 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1983 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #20 | 1,850 | 1 | 25 | 1979 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #169 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1984 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #17 | 1,836 | 1 | 26 | 1980 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #73 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1985 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #81 | 1,706 | 1 | 26 | 1981 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #62 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #799 | 1,668 | 1 | 26 | 1982 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #91 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #219 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |