H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Vladimir Zednik vs Andres Gimeno H2H: 0-2
Andres Gimeno holds a 2–0 lead over Vladimir Zednik in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andres Gimeno leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andres Gimeno won the 1972 Los Angeles quarterfinal 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 1972* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Andres Gimeno | 6-1 6-4 | Vladimir Zednik | Match data |
| May 22, 1971* | Hamburg | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Andres Gimeno | 6-3 6-3 6-2 | Vladimir Zednik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vladimir Zednik | #300 | #35 | 0 | 1,753 | 113 | 157 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Andres Gimeno | #150 | #49 | 0 | 2,038 | 246 | 131 | 65.3% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Vladimir Zednik | Andres Gimeno | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1969 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1970 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1971 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1972 | 19–20 | 48.7% | — | 1,647 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1973 | 14–24 | 36.8% | #90 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1974 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #93 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1975 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #157 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1976 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1977 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #75 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 48–27 | 64.0% | — | 1,757 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1978 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,658 | 0 | 2 | 1969 | 47–21 | 69.1% | — | 1,933 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 1979 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #300 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 | 1970 | 41–25 | 62.1% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 2 | 1971 | 45–26 | 63.4% | — | 1,911 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 53–23 | 69.7% | — | 1,899 | 1 | 12 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #136 | 1,792 | 1 | 12 |