H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Vladimir Zednik vs Cliff Richey H2H: 0-3
Cliff Richey holds a 3–0 lead over Vladimir Zednik in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Cliff Richey leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Cliff Richey won the 1971 Los Angeles second round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 79
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 1971* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Cliff Richey | 7-5 6-4 | Vladimir Zednik | Match data |
| Apr 13, 1971* | Des Moines | ATP 250 | F | Carpet | Cliff Richey | 6-1 6-3 | Vladimir Zednik | Match data |
| Feb 26, 1971* | Salisbury | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Cliff Richey | 6-4 3-6 6-7 6-2 6-1 | Vladimir Zednik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vladimir Zednik | #300 | #35 | 0 | 1,753 | 113 | 157 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Cliff Richey | #662 | #16 | 0 | 2,112 | 488 | 224 | 68.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 23 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Vladimir Zednik | Cliff Richey | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 46–15 | 75.4% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1969 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 64–18 | 78.0% | — | 1,946 | 0 | 9 |
| 23 | 1970 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 88–24 | 78.6% | — | 2,047 | 0 | 14 |
| 24 | 1971 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 67–23 | 74.4% | — | 1,906 | 0 | 17 |
| 25 | 1972 | 19–20 | 48.7% | — | 1,647 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 54–24 | 69.2% | — | 1,956 | 0 | 20 |
| 26 | 1973 | 14–24 | 36.8% | #90 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 47–26 | 64.4% | #19 | 1,848 | 0 | 20 |
| 27 | 1974 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #93 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #23 | 1,891 | 0 | 21 |
| 28 | 1975 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #157 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #32 | 1,855 | 0 | 21 |
| 29 | 1976 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #28 | 1,848 | 0 | 22 |
| 30 | 1977 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #75 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #97 | 1,714 | 0 | 22 |
| 31 | 1978 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,658 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #57 | 1,705 | 0 | 23 |
| 32 | 1979 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #300 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #662 | 1,693 | 0 | 23 |
| 33 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |