H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Vladimir Zednik vs Hans Jurgen Pohmann H2H: 3-0
Vladimir Zednik holds a 3–0 lead over Hans Jurgen Pohmann in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Vladimir Zednik leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Vladimir Zednik won the 1978 Hamburg second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 79
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 1978* | Hamburg | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Vladimir Zednik | 6-2 6-3 | Hans Jurgen Pohmann | Match data |
| Jul 22, 1971* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Vladimir Zednik | 6-3 6-3 6-4 | Hans Jurgen Pohmann | Match data |
| May 21, 1971* | Hamburg | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Vladimir Zednik | 6-4 9-8 6-4 | Hans Jurgen Pohmann | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vladimir Zednik | #300 | #35 | 0 | 1,753 | 113 | 157 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Hans Jurgen Pohmann | #511 | #30 | 0 | 1,802 | 119 | 125 | 48.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Vladimir Zednik | Hans Jurgen Pohmann | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1969 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1970 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1971 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1972 | 19–20 | 48.7% | — | 1,647 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1973 | 14–24 | 36.8% | #90 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #37 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1974 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #93 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 31–30 | 50.8% | #44 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1975 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #157 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 19–27 | 41.3% | #74 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1976 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #40 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1977 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #75 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #263 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1978 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,658 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #284 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 1979 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #300 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #511 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |