H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Vladimir Zednik vs John Bartlett H2H: 2-0
Vladimir Zednik holds a 2–0 lead over John Bartlett in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Vladimir Zednik leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vladimir Zednik won the 1971 Sydney Outdoor third round 4-6 6-7 6-3 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 78
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 1971* | Sydney Outdoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Vladimir Zednik | 4-6 6-7 6-3 6-2 6-2 | John Bartlett | Match data |
| Jan 23, 1970* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Vladimir Zednik | 17-19 6-3 6-2 | John Bartlett | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vladimir Zednik | #300 | #35 | 0 | 1,753 | 113 | 157 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| John Bartlett | #400 | #93 | 0 | 1,507 | 45 | 108 | 29.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Vladimir Zednik | John Bartlett | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1968 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1969 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1970 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1971 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1972 | 19–20 | 48.7% | — | 1,647 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #118 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1973 | 14–24 | 36.8% | #90 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #210 | 1,410 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1974 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #93 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #179 | 1,402 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1975 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #157 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #175 | 1,367 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1976 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #221 | 1,332 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1977 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #75 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #268 | 1,324 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1978 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,658 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #400 | 1,337 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1979 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #300 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |